• Michael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    None are preferrable. Nobody should have that much wealth, power, and influence.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        That nuance is not important - it’s not worth wasting your breath on. If people focused on root causes of the dysfunction and the change needed to solve the issues plaguing our societies - we’d be much better off.

        The nuance isn’t lost to me, I just don’t care to quantify it and then shout it out to the heavens. It makes no difference to me whether Elon Musk is worse than Bill Gates. They can duke that battle out themselves if they care to.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      None are preferable.

      Yes, that is accepted.

      But, given the reality that billionaires do exist, one that spends his money curing diseases is less bad than one who is closing hospitals serving war round populations or actively starving people.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I think making value judgements on individuals is a counterproductive use of our time, energy, and voice. That’s what I’m trying to point out.

        If we focused on root causes and the change we’d like to see to solve those problems, we’d be smooth sailing as a world already.