• CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      There are no shareholders. He took the company private and funds it through advertising and loans. He is the only shareholder.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, no, private companies can still have shareholders; but there’s definitely a lot of differences. Like, having shares in a private company won’t guarantee any right to vote, and I don’t think you can do the whole sue the company for not putting profits over people.

        • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          You’re right, and your take is more nuanced. A huge thing about it being a private company is that they aren’t required to disclose who has ownership stakes, performance against revenue targets, etc. Ostensibly, anyone who isn’t on the inside, and even employees who aren’t privy to management decisions, will be met with more or less a black box about the company’s drivers.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      He wants to be the arbiter of what’s okay and what’s not.

      A deep fake of a Democrat doing something terrible - allowed and oh it’s satire or comedy, no one would think it’s real.

      A deep fake of a republican or conservative - offensive and breaks the rules, immediately banned.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Musk wants to expand his (and putin’s) disinformation empire to control what you hear and think. They rely on obfuscation to sway the narrative to push their agenda, and bots and deepfakes are an effective means to do that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ5XN_mJE8Y