A weakening economy and increasing political repression are forcing ever more Chinese people to emigrate. Spurred by TikTok, many are seeking more sustainable conditions in the United States.

  • harderian729@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good! The more immigration the better!

    I only wish we could have a stipulation that additional immigrants must live outside of major cities, so they can help revitalize America's dying towns.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Rural America is better than a lot of places in the world.

        I'm sure many immigrants would be ecstatic to have the opportunity.

        • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live in a rural town (1 hour+ drive in any drection to the next town) and I could see this being a good thing if implemented correctly. This town isn't equipped for an influx of any people, but has vacant lots that could be turned into a variety of housing. There aren't a lot of jobs, but I would think more people would mean more things could be offered. Potentially great way to invest in rural areas!

          • harderian729@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Heck yeah! Remember, the alternative would be these immigrants being unable to immigrate to the US!

            If they would prefer to stay outside of the US rather than live in rural America, nobody is forcing them to come!

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think we should force you to live in South Dakota, since it needs a little revitalizing.

              • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seeing two of your comments now, I feel you have a bit of a bee in your bonnet about immigrants being forced to live places?

                Care to share more? I don't mean to pre-judge you, I just feel there's more behind your feelings on the matter than I understand yet.

                • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How about, and this might be a little crazy, not forcing people to live somewhere?

                  • harderian729@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You're right. They can just stay in their current nations if they don't want to move to rural America.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I imagine they would; alas it gets a lot more complicated than that.

          I'd like to see a renewed love for rural places generally, and especially in the developing world. There's so much potential there that I feel most people don't see.

            • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay I saw this and first thought it was a reply to another thread about XWindows and exTwitter.

              I'd like to see a renewed love of rural places - not by forcing people to live there.


              But in this thread's hypothetical of immigration to rural parts, there's a difference that it's an invitation: you're invited to come to our country to live in certain areas. It's only "forcing X" if you think you're already entitled to immigrate.

              Like, easing immigration for "skilled workers" isn't forcing anyone to be a "skilled worker".

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                People having to live in certain places aren’t being offered immigration. Immigration means becoming a citizen. Citizens of the United States are free.

                • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That's a fair, and important point, I think. Though I only half agree. Gaining residency also counts as immigration, does it not? At least it's a step in the way to full residency; and those steps do come with a limited freedom.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh we have a similar policy to that in Australia, it’s fucking awful.

      New migrants have to uproot their lives to spend 3 years living in dead end towns with zero job prospects, it’s a huge career killer and ensures immigrants have less opportunities to advance compared to other Australians. It’s also a negative in their ability to form social connections due to the lack of people, or get help from ethnic communities who can share their experiences and knowledge navigating a new country compared to their previous.

      But hey some shitty rural workplaces like abattoirs fucking love the captive workforce to exploit.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would appear that humans, given the free choice, choose to live in cities. Forcing people to go where they’d rather not go is obviously going to be a negative.

        Anytime you override people’s freedom to choose their own path, you make things worse.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I'm sure many of them choose it over their previous nations.

        I don't get what you're trying to say here. It's better these immigrants don't get to immigrate?

          • harderian729@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nobody is "forcing" them to go to rural towns.

            They can choose to stay in their current nation or emigrate elsewhere if rural America is not good enough for them.

            It's literally accepting people who otherwise would not be accepted.

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wow you’re so generous!

              How about simply letting them live like everyone else instead of making them second class citizens with less freedoms just because they want to immigrate?

              • harderian729@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because America's towns are still dying and this is a way to revitalize them.

                If rural America isn't good enough for them, they can stay in their current nation or try to move to a different one.

                The alternative would be them not having this option. This is literally nothing but gain.

                • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The solution to dying towns isn’t to force people to go die in them as well.

                  The alternative would be to let people in without such stupid requirements.

                  • harderian729@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The solution to dying towns isn’t to force people to go die in them as well.

                    Literally not at all what I suggested.

                    Please argue in good faith if you want to be taken seriously by rational people.

                    The alternative would be to let people in without such stupid requirements.

                    If that's what you want, that's fine. I would prefer additional immigrants help restore America rather than leech off of it in a major city.

                    This discussion is over. You may have the last word.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The most beautiful and vital thing about America is freedom. If you cut that down, like by forcing people to live in a particular place, to revitalize something else, you’ve gone downhill.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most will agree immigration is good, but this "let's let everyone in!" mentality is dangerous. China is not our friend…we need to be vetting these people, making sure that everyone who's trying to get in are properly screened.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't agree with "letting everyone in."

        I agree with expanding immigration limits and making it easier for people to immigrate.