Opinionhaver@feddit.uk to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-216 hours agoYour way is now the right way. What is everyone doing wrong?message-squaremessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1message-squareYour way is now the right way. What is everyone doing wrong?Opinionhaver@feddit.uk to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-216 hours agomessage-square135fedilinkfile-text
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·15 hours ago“You killed my father. Prepare to die.” And, for those who don’t know: Although I find out more comfortable to count across and then down; at least the first 4 numbers are the same as base-10 finger counting.
minus-squarebricklove@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-214 hours agoThe best part is that with 2 hands you can count to 156 (12 * 12 on the dozens hand and 12 on the ones hand) Edit: I missed your bit at the end about 2 hands and spent like 10 minutes counting on my hands like a dork double checking my work.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agoIt should be a gross, or 144. How did you get 156? I’m curious! Maybe there’s a counting method with which I’m unfamiliar.
“You killed my father. Prepare to die.”
And, for those who don’t know:
Although I find out more comfortable to count across and then down; at least the first 4 numbers are the same as base-10 finger counting.
The best part is that with 2 hands you can count to 156 (12 * 12 on the dozens hand and 12 on the ones hand)
Edit: I missed your bit at the end about 2 hands and spent like 10 minutes counting on my hands like a dork double checking my work.
It should be a gross, or 144. How did you get 156? I’m curious! Maybe there’s a counting method with which I’m unfamiliar.