• FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You can not make any commentary on Communism here. You will get down voted even if your criticism was correct. Probably even more so and the reason why this is likely to get downvoted out of hand, as well.

    Edit: Proven right. Yet again

      • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Even if your critism was correct…”

        Either way, even me touching on the notion is enough to get downvoted. Proof is my post.

    • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Intelligent commentary on Communism is one thing, lunatic gibberish is of course going to be downvoted.

    • Gibibit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      This whole comment thread sucks lol. The top reaction literally just says “go away”. Talk about wannabe authoritarian tankies

    • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is ok. I have never had an issue sharing facts that may trigger some. In fact the only reason it triggers some is it hits somewhere deep.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            All of it? Your definition of communism is the same as that of the failed dictatorships of the 20th century.

            When most people nowadays talk about socialism or communism they talk about a democracy in the workplace and in politics. People who want a strong state that owns everything are a loud minority in leftist circles, as you can see on lemmy. But they’re not as big in real life.

            • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Thanks for the reply. I am not understanding. What is the modern definition of communism then? Are you saying it is really about Socialism?

              • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                It’s a bit cliche but the first paragraph of wikipedia says it better than I could:

                Communism (from Latin communis ‘common, universal’)[1][2] is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement,[1] whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered on common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products in society based on need.[3][4][5] A communist society entails the absence of private property and social classes,[1] and ultimately money[6] and the state.[7][8][9]

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

                My description above is just a quick way to point to the things that would change in our lived reality (assuming you live in a western democracy). You wouldn’t have to share your house or car or whatever. Just take responsibility for your workplace with colleagues, just like you vote in a democracy.

                • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I moved to Vietnam and thus I am confused about Communism. Seems to me that the state described in the wiki is the same end goal so have read about, but it just seems like we do not get there as humans with power do not want to let go even if the intentions are good. Like BluSky. They have a great vision and idea that reminds me of communism. First you have to have centralize to coordinate the decentralization…and then it never happens. It is why I really believe this only way to keep centralization in check is decentralization to balance the equation.

                  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I don’t think that modern communists should follow the “centralize first and hope the leaders give up the power then” approach.