Using “John Doe” pseudonyms, they sued over whether the investigation into their activities should be made public. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in February that they can be identified and that they haven’t shown that public release of their names violates their right to privacy. The state supreme court denied reconsideration earlier this month and lawyers for the four officers submitted a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking that the names remain protected during their legal challenge.

Four officers who attended events in the nation’s capital on the day of an insurrection claimed they are protected under the state’s public records law. They say they did nothing wrong and that revealing their names would violate their privacy.

  • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I mean, there’s nothing inherently bad about wanting to keep your identity private. That should be a human right, if anything.

    That said, J6ers need to be named and shamed, especially those in positions of power and authority. The latter part should be the single exception for the “privacy is a right” idea.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s not just that, cops use the bullshit “if you have nothing to hide…” line all the time

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yep. I fell for that exactly once, and looking back on it I was incredibly lucky it worked in my favor (I’m also white, which absolutely helped).