data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b14ed/b14ed4b141fdd5e2a893a9a94206ec1abedcab46" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b66/a0b6666baa2926b33ebb55ccaec29fa9aaf08adf" alt=""
Are shitposts still shitposts if they’re in order?
I like to ask a variety of questions, sometimes silly, serious, and/or strange. Never asking in an attempt to pester or “just asking questions” stuff.
I’m generally curious and/or trying to get a sense of people’s views.
Are shitposts still shitposts if they’re in order?
u kitten me right meow?
Why would you fire a fine feline like that?
Where do you tap for the comment reflex?
Do you also cheer?
For what it’s worth, I hadn’t seen that article before, so I was honestly curious about more up to date info on the situation since what I’d last seen.
About 38 minutes in (after scrubbing through to find it, please podcasters include transcripts) I think I found what you were thinking of. However it’s one of the other people that uses the platform mentioning something they’d seen suggesting what OP mentioned, without saying where they saw it.
Inb4 “Substack Nazis boo Nazis Nazis Nazis.” That is incorrect. There were only like 3 neo-Nazis, with about 10 followers apiece, but anyway they kicked them all out some time back now, because the entire internet was yelling at them.
Do you have sources for these claims?
Is in the bathroom a likelihood limbo?
Do you also keep an entrometer around to help guide your activity?
Is it possible to know whether you have without knowing all other preceding thoughts?
That addresses a slightly different question. Supposing people know of the free stuff, why isn’t it discussed as much?
Have you tried using your subscribed feed, other custom feeds, and interfaces that enable keyword filtering?
Let’s say ethically better then, to be more specific and explicit. Although, if we want to talk rock bottom ethically, I think we’d have to go darkweb, no?
Good points! Although I feel like I may be out of the loop on some of the discussion/mention of archive.org stuff, which likely speaks to me being out of it more broadly regarding discussions of other related materials.
Kind of surprised there aren’t more comments along these lines. This was floating around the back of my head as much as some of the other responses.
I mostly agree, and it’s the secondary part, the lack of punishment/consequences that led to asking this question. If the criticism is ineffective at persuading others toward your views, does it outweigh whatever attention/awareness it’s giving the subject?
Given their rampant disregard for the law as-is, what’s stopping Trump from kicking Musk out and just taking his money/assets? Is that somehow too flagrant?
FV?