data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdbef/cdbefee67ba93eb6a28c203067e268cfd048da78" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2a/cfd2a1dbdaa2a4665edc5da6ca698927da8c09c6" alt=""
Both would kill us, so it doesn’t matter which passes the finish line first. This is what the article warns about - massive engineering projects that affect the climate, whether for the purpose of geo-engineering or not.
Nothing wrong with solar IF we can pump the heat out of the atmosphere, or dodge it in some other way. Which we can’t, yet, and a solution to this is not waiting around the corner.
For the right price, I’d buy them. But they’re not the World’s panacea - just a medium term fix, not to be over used.