The next step to ask would be, say for arguments sake this is true, then what comes next?

Would Congress actually act on this and impeach him?

If not, does the CIA and Joint Chiefs have a conversation and then act, to eliminate a domestic enemy?

Dark times to be had, either way. Sucky timeline to live in.

Edit: Addendum. Since one of the links articles is four years old, why hasn’t something been done by Congress by now?

Yep, yep. … Yep.

Honestly not trying to be argumentative here, but it does seem like most voters can be that gullible, concerning what’s currently going on, as well as what’s happened in the past.

Basically every voter thinks the other 49 senators are trash but theirs is always perfect, for some reason.

If people truly voted accurately, a lot of the problems we have today wouldn’t happen. Right now elected officials know that they can just bullshit their way through any conversation with their voters and stay in office, keep their jobs.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

I’m also not sure how it works with the licenses of the instance it’s posted on, and the instances that federate with, store and reproduce the content.

My understanding is a license would stays with the content, no matter where the content is replicated. I also declare that my content is licensed in my user account description as well.

As far as the labeling goes, I normally have it say a little more than what I did in my last comment. Having read your comment and double checking on the Creative Commons site, I did decide to change it to be more descriptive as you advised.

But if you go back through my personal comment history, about nine and a half months or so, you’ll see that there’s been a large quantity conversation about this licensing link, so having just recently returned to Lemmy I was trying to shorten it down, figuring just the actual license information itself was enough of the declaration.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Wanting to talk to other human beings and only getting responses from AI/LLMs is horrible, and a detriment the humanity solving its problems (which may be the point).

_{(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

From the article…

President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post that “he who saves his country does not violate any law,” a variation of a quote attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte.

Was just honestly curious, that’s all.

Well I think it’s okay to honestly ask why someone is doing it, what the rationale was, as part of the conversation.

_{(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

It would have been fine, I was half doing that out of comedy, half doing it out of just shining a spotlight on some automated process that always adds exactly one downvote to every comment being added.

Etc. etc., etc. ?

Honestly curious as to why someone downvoted this too?

Honestly curious as to why someone downvoted this?

Btw, the cross-post still leads to an error page for me.

You’re right! The page loads for me fine, but there’s a marker/tag on there that says “Removed by mod”.

In the past I would just get an error when trying to go to the page.

I removed my ‘Edit2’ addition. Thanks for letting me know.

From the article…

But while many think that YouTube’s system isn’t great, Trendacosta also said that she “can’t think of a way to build the match technology” to improve it, because “machines cannot tell context.” Perhaps if YouTube’s matching technology triggered a human review each time, “that might be tenable,” but “they would have to hire so many more people to do it.”

That’s what it comes down to, right there.

Google needs to spend money on people, and not just rely on the AI automation, because it’s obviously getting things wrong, its not judging context correctly.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

Nooo not the alpacas🫣

“Coming soon to a species near you!”

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

or replying to week-old comments by someone doing the thing I find annoying.

Again, its five days since you posted your comment, not a week, and its just seen by me for the first time about two hours ago.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

The point you felt was worth making a week later

Again, five days ago. Some people like myself stumble upon a post/comment days and days later from when its initially posted.

is that I am free to block someone who does something I find kind of annoying?

Yeah, for some reason people who complain about me using a license seem to keep forgetting that option, but instead just continue to complain, for some strange reason, no matter how many times I remind them of that option. Thought it was a good PSA to remind the complainers they they have alternatives to complaining.

That seems a little extreme to me.

If that seems extreme to you, then you need to touch grass more often.

Extreme would be continuing to complain about something that you have the power to change, but don’t change.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

What is that point?

at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment

You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

You’re free to reply to a week-old comment, too, but neither is a great idea

Actually, five days, not a week.

And also, sometimes its just about making a point, even if you stumble upon something later on. 🤷

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}

at the very least it’s way less annoying to see it on a website than it is under every comment

You’re free to block those that use the license, if you find it annoying to see.

_{Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)}