If you take a lot of long distance trips that it probably makes most sense to just keep a single ICE car. If you only take long trips occasionally then just rent one. Hopefully, buses and trains are also on option for you.

If you’ve got one of those BEVs capable of hundreds of miles of range, but you’re only driving tens of miles everyday, you’re not any better than an F150 owner with a clean bed.

Which buses are those?

My position is that the development of long range BEVs (and all the externalities associated with manufacturing and disposing of these batteries) has been an incredible detour. We already had the technology for fuel cell EVs with as much range as ICE vehicles. Meanwhile, short range BEVs are great because they solve the problem of refueling and avoid the problem of recharging, since you can do it while you sleep work. Long range BEVs just trade refueling for “fast” recharging, which is actually slower and more inconvenient than refueling. Where we really need innovation and development is in mass, public transit.

Take a bus or a train. Public transit is of course the real solution. Transitioning from ICE personal vehicles to personal BEVs doesn’t really solve much and arguably creates more problems.

I just think installing these BEV charging stations everywhere is a bad idea in the first place.

I’m inclined to agree that all motorized personal vehicles and their attendant infrastructure should be eliminated. However, you’re making a false equivalency. I live in New Jersey, so it takes maybe five minutes for me to completely refuel my car with gasoline. My understanding is that it takes six times as long to charge a big EV to ~80%. Therefore, a single fueling station can serve many more people with a much smaller footprint. Furthermore, fuel gets consumed, whereas batteries are mostly dead weight that occasionally do the thermal runaway thing.

That is an interesting position. How do you figure?

I don’t care about any particular EV brand. Trying to use battery powered EVs for such purposes means that they need to built with heavy, oversized, extra hazardous batteries. The responsible, proper use case for BEVs is short trips with plenty of time for charging at home or work.

Instead of socializing the cost of putting charging stations everywhere, landlords and employers should be forced to provide outlets.

Not joking. Why do you think EV owners need charging stations everywhere in order to travel? They’re not restricted to using only their EVs, right?

l’d say that it’s pretty necessary for long-distance trips.

Battery powered EVs should not be used for long-distance trips.

What do you think?

Thermal runaway probably shouldn’t be a realistic consequence of bad quality in any consumer product.

Hmmm. Is there a slur for people who eat synthetic meat?

It just occurred to me that I cannot think of a slur for vegans or vegetarians off the top of my head.

Is a carnist anyone who happens to consume animal protein or just any of a dozen or so influencer/charlatans who advocate for meat consumption?

Is egg production really that bad for the planet? Isn’t it a decent source of fertilizer for plant based food production?

Makes sense. Thanks, Gayhitler.

Rental income is just a dividend on a real estate investment. Even if you own the house you live in, you get that dividend in the form of not having to pay rent to a landlord.

Just one sock of the pair is discolored? Maybe try washing the just the other sock with some poopy underwear to make it browner so the pair matches again.

Bon appétit!

I’m sorry if you feel offended, but I’m using this terminology objectively. I do not believe that being a landlord automatically makes someone a bad person. However, landlordism is an harmful feature of our predominant mode of production. It relies on the prevalence of homelessness as a credible threat, after all.

Your list of anecdotal bad experiences people have had with landlords is utterly immaterial to the discussion of whether landlording is definitionally unethical.

I don’t think I listed any anecdotes. You expressed interest in emotional reasoning as to why people resent landlords so I copied some examples of it that I had already written. The ethicality of being a landlord isn’t relevant to the economic role of landlords as parasites.

The rental income that a landlord collects is not a wage based on any labor that they do.

First of all, how is that true?

The fact that landlord’s do not collect rent based on any labor that they do hasn’t been in question since Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations at the latest. Rental income is also known as passive or unearned income. That’s the appeal of it to landlords or prospective landlords. It’s an established concept. Even if you think that residential rental agreements are perfectly free and voluntary, that’s irrelevant to the fact that landlords do not produce or provide anything.