Saddling others with the effort of sourcing information they did not call into question is a typical tactic of Russian disinformation agents. As is affirming something incorrect using two separate accounts. I’m not accusing you of anything, but I am saying that you’re acting precisely like a Russian disinformation agent and I urge you to consider your behavior.
Exactly why dooming isn’t constructive. May, might be, possibly, etc. are worthless words. Without specific and actionable information, it’s just distracting noise. You don’t “possibly” incarcerate more innocents than not. You do or you don’t. Which is to say, I agree with you
I considered it when I got my friends to join Reddit ~20 years ago. I made a second account that just posted links to cat pics, no comments. Cute animals are a safe bet.
Bonus, they started sending me cute pictures of their ferrets and dogs that I wish I had backed up beyond a long forgotten flickr
They made a claim, you doof. I have no proof of the antithesis of their claim.
You’re telling me that you legitimately believe that over 50% of crimes worth investigating are attributed to the wrong person or ignored? The issues plaguing the system are more varied and nuanced than every other death row inmate being unjustly imprisoned. What you’re saying legitimately sounds like nonsense.
Objectively, there are more safeguards and methods for investigation now than 100 years ago. Dooming over a broken but repairable system is rarely constructive.
For an incredibly long time, the purpose of the police was to offer the appearance of stability and consequences. They rarely “got their man” and instead opted to simply scapegoat a random undesirable in order to perpetuate the lie, if they did anything tangible at all.
My question is, when do you think they finally managed to at least break even? What year did the number of cases actually solved equal or exceed the number of cases bungled, weaponized, or ignored?
No. Absolutely not, no. Not even ironically.
(Reposting)
It’s a metaphor for the diabolical nonsense people constantly post on 4chan. Anon is either deluded (less likely) or attempting to lure others into unhealthy lifestyle decisions for fun. The main character is a robot, a la r9k, and the only ones cheering are other odd misfits. The women are, on the other hand, human shaped, once again reinforcing the gulf in humanity between the members of the board and those outside of it. Much of 4chan is poopie rapie.
With that said, yes, absolutely, I agree
(Unfortunately) relevant. The most nsfw, you’ve been warned.
Lemmy is more its memes than its technocommunist roots. It’s not a very sticky experience if you don’t like the memes. (I like the memes)
Really, this amounts to a question of who has recommended lemmy to others. Which is an interesting question.
Ended up watching a few more clips. It’s funny, I didn’t think bravo was funny when I watched it in passing but now it gets a giggle out of me.
Alright, fine, I cede that it’s not funny. Though neither was the original. They never managed to improve upon Pepe le pew.
This cartoon feels particularly difficult to reboot at anything less than a pg-13. And I really hope that opinion persists for the next 4 years.
But it would be interesting to watch it as a limited series where he overcomes his preconceptions to become an actual decent person in a cooperative relationship. Or where he spirals into the extremes of toxic masculinity and becomes horrifically human. Love me a fall from grace.
Right? It’s such a ridiculous statement. You’d think the president were a serial rapist, or something.
Can’t wait to vacation in cape Canadarel