data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f23ae/f23ae0dbc3c54d384754da0746b7df9d687fc207" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
Plus they don’t have to book the liability on the balance sheet!
Plus they don’t have to book the liability on the balance sheet!
Ehhhhh very mildly rude if at all. Like it’s not the most polite response but people are allowed to express themselves too
Nah this would just unlock a new trove of racist tropes for him
Everyone has a test environment but only a few separate prod
See also: bullshit Jobs
U-Haul trailer when you need it?
Dems removed filibuster for all appointment except scotus in 2013 then R’s removed for scotus in 2017. Now republicans could have done it anyway on 2017 even without precedent, and Democrats could have forced merick garland in if they had gone fully nuclear. I’d call it equally shared
That would make sense if there were facts that we all agreed on……
Apparently other people want other things… like civil discourse and pertinent analysis. just move along already
95% of trips are 30 miles or less. Of course everyone is the exception, we’re all above average drivers here.
And even if it was pointed at random human equipment it’s so far away that you need a very special radio and antenna; not just any old satellite is necessarily going to do the trick. I think the signal strength is around -196db iirc so incredibly faint, and The antennas they use to communicate with voyager are massive.
I run a local MediaWiki appliance from turnkeylinux, super easy to spin up in proxmox.
Idk Still sounds to me like this is mostly a clever way to denigrate and dismiss people who aren’t doing things the “right” way.
And I also don’t buy that patriotic duty is the only motivation to work on improving things
But if it works for you then good on ya
I know that’s the argument but Framing it as ‘the new folks on the block don’t want to build bridges’ isn’t a very good way to build bridges.
Basically I think this whole analysis is a lazy way to dismiss the new left. Not that they’re perfect or anything, but I think there is an equal responsibility for both groups to work together.
With identity politics, it seems even worsened that the new left cares about ideological purity and sin which prevents coalition type movements.
This critique is pervasive and has always rung hollow to me when trying to navigate this divide. The onus is also on the old left to build bridges imho
Pretty damning with faint praise there really.
Just got to find the right contest, friend
The recrimination goes both ways is my point, and is to the detriment of both
It seems to me that the old left doesn’t want to play with the new left just as much as vice versa. Definitely a shame that they can’t work together better but blaming it all on the kids is a strangely conservative position for the ‘old left’ to take….
Well it is now that you opened the spigot