• 1 Post
  • 352 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle





  • Dems have no choice but to confirm her through.

    That was the Bernie plan in 2016 & 2020 during the primaries. Clinton had the support of the established Democratic party and with superdelegates Clinton took a commanding lead. Similar situation with Biden, most dropped out before Super Tuesday and endorsed him.

    Now both of these instances could be considered “smart politics”. If you’ve got the political maneuvering to win the primary, then maybe you’ve got the same maneuvering to win the general.

    It didn’t work out for Clinton. It did work out for Biden.

    When we look at our most recent election, it’s clear there was a little bit more of a rift, but Harris was chosen and there was no primary.

    Now, some of this is simplified and there is plenty to argue. But suffice to say we can’t just vote for AOC “so much” that she’ll win. I don’t see the Democratic party supporting her.

    Now it’s too early to talk about 2028 realistically and a lot can change between now and then, but if she were running today she’d have my vote.




  • https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/federation-architecture

    And reading an article from TechCrunch,

    “The social network has a Twitter-like user interface with algorithmic choice, a federated design and community-specific moderation.”

    “Is Bluesky decentralized? Yes. Bluesky’s team is developing the decentralized AT Protocol, which Bluesky was built atop.”

    “However, the launch of federation will make it work more similarly to Mastodon in that users can pick and choose which servers to join and move their accounts around at will.”


    So it definitely is pitching that is it decentralized and federated. Maybe the argument is that it “will be”, but at the moment it is not and at the moment it does not look like it will be an actual possibility.

    Now people leaving Twitter is great, don’t get me wrong, but it’s possibly just kicking the can down the road. In a few years we’ll likely have articles complaining about missing “Old Bluesky” and how “new Bluesky” has the exact same problems that “Old Twitter” had.


  • If no one cares enough to reopen it once every 6 months, then it’s probably fine to ignore it indefinitely.

    It’s a matter of psychology. If I file a bug and it is ignored for years, I’m annoyed but eventually I either accept it, find a workaround or move on to something new. I may still file bugs in the future, especially if I’ve got a workaround, since other people probably want to know.

    However if my bug is closed and I have to reopen it every six months. Now I’m kinda pissed. I have to be reminded every six months for years that this is just broken. I put in the effort, but now some bot has just come along and closed it. Plus it’s going to be harder to find an existing or similar bug. I’m less likely to look at closed bugs. But also, what if I find four similar closer bugs. Now if someone was tracking that bug they don’t realize this has happened to four different users. If we had just kept it in one big we’d all know. Also someone elses workaround is better than mine, or maybe it’s worse.

    I understand if a project wants to declare bug bankruptcy. It shouldn’t happen often but if you do that’s the time to organize things.




  • I agree and disagree. That is the question you ask. That is not how you start a conversation. I’m not assuming corruption. Some of them I’ve generally agree with in the past, maybe I will this time, this was an important vote, it’s going to be difficult to convince me.

    I know being tricked is a possibility. It’s politics. Sometimes you got got. That sucks, you live another day. You get got (tricked) enough, I lose my faith.

    But of course the fucked up thing is, we’re debating Democrat representatives. It’s a whole extra level of fucked up that Republican representatives just get a pass. The ole, I know you’re a piece of shit so of course you’re terrible and voted against it.

    Again I don’t want to excuse bad actions, but also let’s not ignore the shitty actions of those known to be shitty. It’s an important reality to be aware of.




  • Because it’s bad if China has the information. It’s fine if “US entity” had the information. The ban is ultimately fake. No one banning the app cares about TikTok, they just hate that China is getting the information they want. What will happen is some US based company, Oracle last time, but someone like that will buy a sufficient enough stake in the company and the ban will not happen. It will be declared “safe” and the data will go to a US controlled entity, but also still secretly to China. (The later will be revealed years later, to the shock of no one.)