Do you want to readegermansmemessfrom ich_iel? Cause that’s how you get german memes from ich_iel.

No, propaganda is when Putin pays trolls to disagree with me online.

Kaufland is open to marketplace skalpers.

No parallel universes employed => Access denied

deleted by creator

I guess we’re old now, if folks don’t know trollface anymore.

Ygu must understand that for the democrats, being the lesser evil is the whole selling point. They need to act like the respectable option, but in essence, they rely on the republicans.

Damn, I need to rewatch that show.

Including the kids? 😳

Go look for other day old comments where some outside perspective gets downvoted in your echochamber. You certainly need the ego-boost. /s

Wow, you’re pathetic.

But don’t defend her, or you’ll be banned like me

Wear it as a badge of fucking honor. You’ve seen what makes them cheer.

I’m seriously anything but a Mao simp. But afaik, the famine in China wasn’t done on purpose, while the Germans industrialized murder.

Or baby snatchers

back when we were trying to have a conversation.

You were trying to have a conversation and managed to goat me into replying. Again, I said:

I don’t considersit fruitful to argue with such a devout Leninist in a meme community.

but then why bother replying to me?

Because social media has addictive properties and I couldn’t help myself. I’m not accusing you of malcontent, but please stop enabling me.

I’m not avoiding a conversation, I simply have better things to do.

Nooo, those letters to the Sozialistischer Kegelklub, Straubing are vital! Without them you misunderstand Marxism!!! /s 😭😭😭

Thanks for proving my point. Mansplaining can be done by anyone, btw. Not directed at your identity, but what you’re doing. Have fun writing the next essay as a reply. I probably won’t read it, as I’ve got a household to manage.

Edit: I changed my mind. Sorry for the gendered term. Should have said “tanksplain” or “MLsplain”.

It isn’t what you said, but it’s what you revealed yourself to have meant.

Bullshit.

you used Anarchist reasoning that goes against all of Marxism

Not if you have a more narrow definition of Marxism, which only includes the theory Marx wrote himself, seated in his historical, social framework.

the notion that it’s “idealist” makes no sense. You never back that up

I did, but you refused to accept that by claiming that my definition of a class was wrong, or something. Then you claim that I haven’t made a point, just because it contradicts your sacred texts.

You’re obviously way too keen on mansplainingtanksplain socialism to people. I have reproductive labour to attend to, so I don’t have the energy and/or time to satisfy your need for theoretical circlejerking in ML theory. You can (and probably will) write your BS assumptions about me, while quoting Engels once more, if you want. Whatever makes you feel superior to the ignorant anarchist. But excuse me when I’m muting this conversation.

We therefore arrive at the true meaning of your first comment: Marxism isn’t Anarchist, so it isn’t Socialist.

lol, not what i said, comrade.

You don’t, however, have a background in Marxist theory, so you can’t speak as though you do!

Yeah, that’s not true. I’ve read a bit of Marx and enough of Engels. I can barely keep up with the theory that’s coherent to my worldview. I’m not willing to read up on 100 years of outdated political theory.

As I’ve said a few times before: you’re way too commited to the leninist party line that you bend over backwards to justify your positions, claiming the “dictatorstip of the proletariat” is materialist, while ignoring the empirical evidence staring you in the face.