• 3 Posts
  • 796 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle

  • This seems like a standard hopium piece on the left. Take the first anecdote:

    Last June, the popular UFC fighter Sean Strickland surprised onlookers when, immediately following a victory, he ducked into the audience and took a photo with a bystander: Donald Trump. “President Trump, you’re the man, bro,” Strickland declared in his post-match interview with Joe Rogan. “It is a damn travesty what they’re doing to you. I’ll be donating to you, my man. Let’s get it done.” Video of the moment rocketed across social media, serving as an early indicator of Trump’s enduring strength with his base, despite his recent felony convictions.

    Strickland went viral last week for a very different reason: opposition to the president and his plan to take over Gaza. “Man if Trump keeps this bs up I’m about to start waving a Palestinian flag,” the fighter posted on X. “American cities are shitholes and you wanna go spend billions on this dumpster fire. Did we make a mistake?! This ain’t America first.” Strickland’s lament racked up 159,000 likes and 13.2 million views.

    This isn’t even buyer’s remorse - Strickland couldn’t even bring himself to make a statement rather than a question - but even assuming it is, the article fundamentally misunderstands MAGA believers’ relationship with Trump. Sure, they will question random one-off decisions, but even outright contradicting their own interests will at best draw this - momentary mild annoyance. Meanwhile, if next week Trump says something that can be contorted to be a show of support for their own goals, even if wildly improbable and incoherent, they’ll be back to fawning over him.

    We see him as a toddler, or a middle-school bully who tears the legs off frogs for fun. Yes, that is true, but irrelevant. What this article writer doesn’t get is that parents will usually do anything to protect their baby, or live in denial that their middle-schooler is a psychopath.

    These complaints are in reality just cries for the warm blanket of propaganda to lull them back to sleep with some easy answer, and annoyance at the vertigo of momentarily seeing reality. The thesis that Trump’s support will fall over time because of this is absurd.


  • I was surprised to see Zuckerberg with higher unfavorable and lower favorable ratings. Musk is in my opinion clearly the most evil and hateful figure at the moment. But then when they break out the statistics by party, it makes sense and seems obvious.

    Everyone on both sides politically dislikes Zuck, because Facebook is a hellhole. But Musk has the GOP. Averaged out, Musk gets a boost, benefitting from the politicization.

    It seems like this is putting data behind the motive for Zuck more publicly supporting right wing efforts.


  • They can convert that money into control/ownership over land and people.

    If the economy is broken for everyone else, but you control the survival of people (through destroying or blocking labor laws, wage protections, public insurance, and eventually distribution of food and water, etc) and the space around those people (land, property), that control will outlast the economy and potentially the government. That’s because they can afford their own monopoly on violence in a given domain, if the state’s monopoly falls apart.

    We’re not quite there yet, but fiefdoms could yet come back in style.








  • Ok, can these agencies please stop playing nice with these criminals? They enter the building, lie about benign process, and act like black hat hackers as soon as they get in.

    Refuse them access. Make Trump publicly admit he’s illegally shutting down these agencies if he’s purportedly given these clowns permission to do so. If you’re all going to get fired anyway at least make a stand before you do. I know it takes courage, but please stop giving these hatchet men the courtesy of cover.




  • I have now!

    I think for me, the challenge is finding something that breaks down trends and ideas without resorting to discourse that’s been overworked. Vocabulary that already has been politicized by society won’t change any minds because exposure immunizes people against ideas, even good ones. The revolutionary idea becomes mundane given exposure plus time.

    That’s what I think is unique about Adam Curtis, is he studiously avoids any framing that feels like a rote “capitalism” critique, but instead speaks to something more fundamental to human nature.







  • Elon Musk polled users on X about reinstating Elez, with 78% supporting his return.

    I know why Musk does this - manufacturing the appearance of consent and perpetuating his “vox pupuli” delusion - but at this point, it’s so transparent that his followers are sycophantic blue-checks and bots that it’s insulting to even pretend this matters any more than a Russian election.

    Unrelated other point: love it how Vance sees he’s fully reduced to an afterthought, so of course to try to increase his standing with Trump he tries to out-shameless the rest. At this point all of the GOP are like colorful birds putting on mating dances for Trump, competing who can be the most craven and subservient, hoping he picks them.