Is it better to not let it burn or clear out fuel, in the long run?

I thought it best to let some burn in a controlled matter so in a couple of years it’ll become less of a hazard

I still doubt anything will convince ppl to leave fb at this point, with their long history of breaking users trust

Idk if it’ll save any money, costs pennies to manufacture

All of it, if it helps with neuroplasticity

And in the sun, strong headlights, rain, dust

Excuse my ignorance but organize to do what specific actions?

They should force the government use cybertrucks for employe transportation just like Elon did with X and NTSB

Probably when it’s as important to them as thing given the reaction it got from the public

Idk how he got treated in training to become an astronaut as someone who was partially funding it (conflict of interest wise). Definitely has some insights into the internals of the program now

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/my-phone-listening-me

Defeatism plays into their advantage, you can always minimize the tracking. E.g. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54033555-extreme-privacy

Publication: https://drive.usercontent.google.com/download?id=1MZrFRii_nJYdW8RulORB9JveLkCRbncX&export=download&authuser=0

Couldn’t get a translation in place sp asked an AI to answer what is the researchers definition of self harm: According to the report, the researchers define self-harm content as material that shows, encourages and/or romanticizes self-harm. This includes content that:

• Expresses a desire for self-harm
• Shares advice on self-harming behavior
• Shows images of increasingly serious self-harm
• Encourages others to engage in similar self-harming behavior

The self-harm content was categorized into 4 levels of increasing severity:

1. Non-explicit image with text explicitly mentioning self-harm
2. Depicting self-harm without blood
3. Referring to self-harm in both text and image, without blood
4. Illustrating severe self-harm involving blood in both text and image/video

So their definition covers a spectrum from text references to self-harm all the way to explicit visual depictions of serious self-harm acts involving blood. The categories represent an increasing degree of overtness in the self-harm content. ^[1]

When the water wars start, they’ll understand

#noyoudidthis

They’d just buy assets that others won’t be able to afford and hoard more

I don’t see the connection between Lemmy and Bluesky/reasoning, can you elaborate?

Two Tesla owners walk into a bar. One stops in the middle on the way to the aeat and the other one drives right into a fire truck

Can we do bullet bullet points for extra creativity?

First thing that came to mind reading the headline