Is a crash “completion”? If that’s what we call complete that makes my life a lot easier on some projects 😅

It’s funny because you can tell whoever wrote this has never run that command. You need to either put --no-preserve-root OR /*. Using /* obviates the need for the flag --no-preserve-root.

As someone who believes in, deploys, and locally validates DNSSEC I disagree with your meme lol.

This reminds me of this lol… unrelated but still funny

…I want details. Java is my most used language and I want to know lol

I don’t get it? When has this ever fixed a bug? Compiler error sure? But a bug?

Yeah I agree, they are but I guess what I’m trying to get at is in day to day conversation I use “programming language” as a term for compiled languages hence “real” and “scripting language” for scripting languages. I never say “real” in conversation, just in the context of this post and as I mentioned it’s not to say scripting languages aren’t good languages, just how I separate them. Your distinction is much better in more comparative dialog such as this

I’m aware of the increasing prevalence of JIT, that doesn’t change the other markers I listed. Ironically though the language the post is about, CPython still lacks JIT. Also I disagree in general, there are things scripting languages can’t do and will never be practical for. It’s not that they aren’t useful programming languages, that’s not what I’m saying but I think having a separate category for them is useful.

I personally draw a distinction between “real” programming languages and scripting languages. Scripting languages being languages that are traditionally source distributed. They tend to be much easier to write, run slower, often but not always dynamically typed, and operate at a higher level than “real” programming languages. That’s not to say they aren’t actually useful or difficult to learn etc. It’s not a demeaning separation, just a useful categorization IMO. Not to say the categorization always holds water in all those attributes, luajit is way faster than Java but it does follow the other bits. As someone who loves C there are lots of languages that seem too limiting and high level, doesn’t mean they aren’t useful tho.

He said they’re not going to change it, just make the dialog a lot more clear and add a second button to it that will only do a reset without the clean.

-_-…8 needs to die already. Most of my projects heavily depend on modern features, I even have one that straight up requires JPMS

Don’t you mean buttbuttinate?

It’s replacing all instances of arse and ass with bottom…but doing so in about the most naïve way possible.

Most of the situations I encounter RSA are in projects where I hope RSA is implemented correctly. I have a lot of Let’s Encrypt certs that are still RSA and my main SSH keys are still RSA. All of these were generated quite some time ago. I understand the problem with projects that implement it incorrectly but I’d hope OpenSSH and certbot aren’t those projects 😥

Fact of the matter is RSA is perfectly secure still…and ECDSA/ED25519 should also be extinct given the rising need for post quantum cryptography

I do whenever there is a vulnerability of note. I don’t do it on a regular basis though.

Just checked, I’m at 311 on my main server

This meme must be old as Java 9 added jmods

Huh, yeah I suppose that’s true. Qubes is an interesting project but I’m not sure it’s for me. I selectively isolate apps I worry about using containers, I actually should give flatpak a try as it basically does that for me but I haven’t seriously tried it yet.

Ollama is also a cool way of running multiple models locally