Some dingbat that occasionally builds neat stuff without breaking others. The person running this public-but-not-promoted instance because reasons.

  • 1 Post
  • 452 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 26th, 2024

help-circle




  • So wait a damn minute here. Target, a MN company, had (past tense) an expansive DEI program that they recently scrapped following along with the trend from multiple other outfits.

    Unlike many other places the public actually got mobilized in some level to show they’re pissed off at Target for ditching the program and refusing to shop there.

    NOW the FL attorney general decided they should try and file a suit against them for being ‘woke’?

    What kind of backwards response is that? It hardly even makes sense from a political theater perspective much less in any practical way. Fascists, still unable to find their own ass with both hands and a flashlight…

    Edit: It occured to me that as conspiratorial as it sounds it’s possible Target begged for this treatment to try and gain some sympathy points for being picked on by the big bad far right. Give the people someone else they already hate to point at and maybe some ‘forget’ that you the company just gave a big FU to a sizable portion of your customers/employees/suppliers.


  • That last part sounds like grand idea, and likely not too hard to do on the client side. Perhaps just a way to sort things by tagging a comm with some flag and all the ones with a specific flag show up in a custom feed. That way even if the names are not quite the same you could create these merged comms to read from.

    The hard part there would be posting, you would want some kind of easy way to send a new post to a specific one, but I can’t say having a ‘post to all’ would be a good idea, that sounds like a spam poster’s best friend.


  • In the simplest sense, a separation of duties. If the judge was to be the sole decider of what is worth consideration then you have this individual functioning as an unquestioned king.

    No single person is going to know every case, consider every angle, and have an inclination to pursue all points of view. Even the supreme court receives amicus briefs to guide a case.

    An attorney has a duty to get the best possible outcome for their client, even if they disagree with what the client may have done. A single person judiciary could never have that position because they are effectively advocating both sides to themselves.