They were in the in-group as long as they paid taxes and followed the laws of the people in control of their lives. As long as they never disobeyed or rebelled. I urge you to look up consent before you hurt somebody.
Every Empire has a period of expansion and prosperity, modern-day Republicans are trying to bring back the policies that destroyed Rome, without understanding that conservatism is always the corruption that leads to fascism.
It's not my understanding of Romans that is flawed, it's your understanding of freedom and choice.
I doubt any of the cultures that were invaded by Roman expansion were given any choice in the matter. Conservatism always has different standards for the in group versus the out group.
It's only hard to fight against it because our champions are wolves in sheep's clothing. The Democrats don't want to undermine their own power either, they just want you to think they do.
We're actually trying to go back to the Roman Empire, a Fourth Reich, if you will.
Yes, but I was speaking more broadly than private prisons. There are many reasons to restrict a person's freedom, and many ways to do it.
If a person's right to freedom is removed, then the moral responsibility for their health and wellness falls upon their captors, regardless of what the law allows.
We have investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing. There's nothing cruel and unusual about slow cooking prisoners at 120F.
They all network and share information with each other. Shitbirds flock together.
Libs of TikTok is the same group of malcontents who doxxed and swatted people from the KiwiFarms servers and 4chan before that. They're terrorists and they should be dealt swift and violent justice.
Between this loser and Boebert, it's clear that Republicans barely know what sex is. They're like unsupervised special ed students.
As long as those plea deals also include prison time. I'm sure there's plenty of evidence without their testimonies. Trump's allies aren't our best and brightest.
Correction: She was impregnated by him. I'm sure there were scientists and sycophants involved.
The word you’re looking for is naive, and your opinion means less than nothing to me.
Happy populations with all their needs met don’t have drug addiction, poverty, homelessness, or nearly as many impulsive violent crimes. Shit rolls downhill, but responsibility can never be delegated. The people at the top are responsible for every crime that happens within their borders because they declare what is illegal, they control the conditions, and they allocate resources to either supporting, imprisoning, enslaving, or murdering their dissident populations.
Discrimination is the point of every dress code. They can’t have commoners walking freely through the House of Lords, or whatever these fuckheads want to call themselves this incarnation.
They should be hung from the roof upside down and naked. Instead we get to watch them bicker like children over the scraps of the government they’ve yet to destroy.
Sweden’s prime minister on Thursday said that he’s summoned the head of the military to discuss how the armed forces can help police deal with an unprecedented crime wave that has shocked the country with almost daily shootings and bombings.
Getting the military involved in crime-fighting would be a highly unusual step for Sweden, underscoring the severity of the gang violence that has claimed a dozen lives across the country this month, including teenagers and innocent bystanders.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that he would meet with the armed forces’ supreme commander and the national police commissioner on Friday to explore “how the armed forces can help police in their work against the criminal gangs.”
I’m talking about this, idiot.
Are they using violence to quell dissent generated from their failure to adequately represent their population? Your answer is the same as mine, if you’re honest.
Define mental illness, define addiction, define help, define force.