When J Edgar Hoover is too much of a “liberal commie” for your tastes…

Careful, using fancy Latin words might get you labeled as one of those “intellectuals,” or an “illegal” from Latin America.

House Bill 807, nicknamed the “Save MO Babies Act,” was proposed by Republican state Rep. Phil Amato.

The bill summary states that, if passed, Missouri would create a registry of every expecting mother in the state “who is at risk for seeking an abortion” starting July 1, 2026. The list would be created through the Maternal and Child Services division of the Department of Social Services, but the measure did not specify how the “at risk” would be identified.

The same dickheads who want a registery of pregnant women would screech about tyranny if there was a registery of gun owners.

Their only animating principle is “I get to tell ‘inferior people’ what to do.”

Have you looked into selling to reenactors?

They seem willing to pay for handcrafted stuff.

DPD has a loooooong, fucked up history with minorities. I’m not fan of cops, but I’ll take a W where I can get it.

If you’re gonna catch some criminals, you’re gonna have to crack a few kid skulls.

Besides, being a cop is mostly boring. Don’t they deserve to act like an action movie hero every once in a while? It can’t all just be shooting dogs and writing tickets.

Is this your OC? I like your art style.

He only voted “no” because he knew it wouldn’t make a difference, and this way he gets to pretend like he’s a reasonable person.

Yes, it’s common to all flavors of reactionary ideology.

Which is why it’s so rich for conservatives to pretend to hate “identity politics.” It’s literally all they have.

Their conception of morality is exactly backwards.

They first consider if the person aligns with their in-group. If so, then whatever they do (so long as it doesn’t directly have a negative impact on themselves) is by nature good.

Obversely, if a person is a member of a group that is not aligned with their tribe then any action taken is inherently wicked and detrimental to society.

They don’t judge morality by the action, they judge it by the actor.

Careful using Spanish words like “uno,” you might get deported.

German chocolate is like a whole other food than the wax that Hershey’s pretends is the real thing.

From They Thought They Were Free, the Germans 1933-45:

Because the mass movement of Nazism was nonintellectual in the beginning, when it was only practice, it had to be anti-intellectual before it could be theoretical. What Mussolini’s official philosopher, Giovanni Gentile, said of Fascism could have been better said of Nazi theory: “We think with our blood.” Expertness in thinking, exemplified by the professor, by the high-school teacher, and even by the grammar-school teacher in the village, had to deny the Nazi views of history, economics, literature, art, philosophy, politics, biology, and education itself.

Thus Nazism, as it proceeded from practice to theory, had to deny expertness in thinking and then (this second process was never completed), in order to fill the vacuum, had to establish expert thinking of its own—that is, to find men of inferior or irresponsible caliber whose views conformed dishonestly or, worse yet, honestly to the Party line. The nonpolitical pastor satisfied Nazi requirements by being nonpolitical. But the nonpolitical schoolmaster was, by the very virtue of being nonpolitical, a dangerous man from the first. He himself would not rebel, nor would he, if he could help it, teach rebellion; but he could not help being dangerous—not if he went on teaching what was true. In order to be a theory and not just a practice, National Socialism required the destruction of academic independence.

In the years of its rise the movement little by little brought the community’s attitude toward the teacher around from respect and envy to resentment, from trust and fear to suspicion. The development seems to have been inherent; it needed no planning and had none. As the Nazi emphasis on nonintellectual virtues (patriotism, loyalty, duty, purity, labor, simplicity, “blood,” “folk-ishness”) seeped through Germany, elevating the self-esteem of the “little man,” the academic profession was pushed from the very center to the very periphery of society. Germany was preparing to cut its own head off. By 1933 at least five of my ten friends (and I think six or seven) looked upon “intellectuals” as unreliable and, among these unreliables, upon the academics as the most insidiously situated.

Took you all morning to think of that gem, huh?

Being a Nazi apologist must consume all of your brainpower.

Reactionary ideology is all about protecting privilege by demonizing marginalized people. They believe in zero-sum rights and privileges: in their view, expansion of rights for another group inherently means a loss of rights for them.

Oh, I appreciate the heads-up, but I’m well aquatinted with this particular reactionary.

I just think it’s important to point out that he’s a Nazi apologist; I don’t really expect a coherent answer.

What power did he really have?

You’re just repeating reactionary talking points, not really a surprise.

He was also one of the most well known of “Trump’s men.” Here’s a hint: each STATE decided whether they would shut things down or not.

Hey, what do we call Nazi apologists?

Fauci isn’t a Nazi kleptocrat who is trying to dismantle the administrative state.

Reactionaries sure love to play dumb, huh?

Hey, what do we call Nazi apologists?

So that begs the question: what is this all about?

Wrecking the economy so billionaires can buy up infrastructure at fire-sale prices?

Says the guy who pretends Musk didn’t do a Nazi salute.