Are we? I feel like that’s a pretty necessary “/s” considering the mental gymnastics I’ve heard IRL and on Lemmy. If they edit their comment to add that very necessary qualifier, I’ll happily throw 'em an upvote. As-is, I genuinely have no idea.

And idiotic absolutism is why we’re in this mess.

Good job!

Edit: If you meant the /s on your comment, my bad. There’s just so many insane takes going around, I kind of need that to differentiate.

At least you have them. We don’t :'(

It’s a conspiracy, bud. Trying to keep the truth down!

OR…there’s like 300 duplicates of the exact same thing because everyone thinks they’re CNN and the first to break the story and the mods are cleaning up.

Take your pick.

I’ve been using this one a bit more during these federation backups. I can’t really adopt it as my daily driver, though. My home instance is the one I run, so I tend to favor it. lol

If my instance ever gets sync’d back up where I can interact in something approximating real-time, I may make that happen lol.

Rule 3 seems to be very unenforced lately 😠

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hindustan-times/

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Questionable Reasoning: Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: India
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

Because that would greatly harm accessibility for the visually impaired.

And if you wanted to adhere to accessibility guidelines for the conversational images, you'd need to add alt text to them. But then the ML models can train on that, so you're back to square one.

What kind of misogynistic bullshit is this?

Edit: Oh, I see you edited the post.