Vive* la révolution (français) ou viva la revolución* (espagnol)

Heidegger was a literal Nazi but we still still use his work because Being and Time is so important.

Lol go to Korea and see all the other consumer facing stuff. LG shampoo if you want.

1 second per kb lol

Where is this from? I’d be interested in hearing what they’re saying here.

Chromium is open source, Google bases their Chrome off of it, but Chrome is not open source.

Point: missed

Equity comes out of the idea that people don’t all have the same ability or means to do things. Equity is the leveling of the playing field so that no matter someone’s level of intelligence, economic background, or any other efficiency/deficiency, everyone has the same opportunity to participate.

Equality gives staircases to everyone. In this case, not everyone can go up a floor. Equity builds ramps, lifts, or both. In this case everyone has an equal opportunity to go up a floor. You can’t have equal opportunity without equity.

No. Reductively I’d say equity is a prerequisite for equal opportunity.

Waste of time since your ability to read seems low. Equality ≠ equity

You can be a dual citizen and be living outside of the US and still vote. You can be an American citizen who has never lived in America and vote. It’s not about permanent residency at all.

https://www.usa.gov/who-can-vote

A regular smile is shown a lot in the eyes. The eyes are dead and hollow in this picture

Um

Can you explain that one then because I’m really not seeing what you’re saying.

With a caveat on the shield. It’s still android TV so ideally you put your own OS on it if you’re worried about that kind of thing.

Why do you need a DE for your server?

My needs are for my os to be my toy

Just to be clear—I know it’s said that this is almost a gish gallop statement—but it absolutely is not.

Since we’re just talking about the headline and not the contents of the article, then this is just a statement. It’s not an argument so it can’t be a gish gallop. If we take the implications of the statement as premises and the headline as a conclusion, then this is just one singular argument which also means it cannot be a gish gallop. Any argument will have a number of premises. Where do you begin? At any of the premises. Demonstrating that the premises are false will show the conclusion to be false. By definition a gish gallop is a great number of arguments that overwhelm an opponent. One argument simply cannot be a gish gallop.

What are your numbers supposed to mean? From your article:

Prior to the debate, a New York Times/Siena College poll released Sept. 28 found Midwestern voters prefer Walz to Vance: Walz was viewed favorably by 44% of voters and unfavorably by 41%, while Vance was viewed favorably by 42% of voters and unfavorably by 48%.

So 44% like Walz, 42% like Vance. 41% dislike Walz, 48% dislike Vance. Comparing 42 and 41 is comparing two different things

They also don’t hold back the aur which causes problems if an aur package is expecting a system package of a particular version, if I understand correctly