Oof, hell no. That’s some Facebook level cancer right there when they removed downvotes.

It’s just a form of white washing that makes the same people who made up being offended by “black lists” and “master branch”.

Shitty time to be alive when it’s no longer cool to shoot Nazis.

It’s an absolute PITA in my experience.

I tried this with TD Canada. Accessing the money was problematic.

Because breaking things is easy and building things is hard? Also doesn’t help when nearly half of your elected representatives work against building things.

After nearly a year of Kagi. It’s actually painful when I’m on a device with just Google.

Would recommend if you are a knowledge worker or researcher, or just in a technical field.

Lemmy users very biased link to article that isn’t nearly as biased as they are purposefully biasing.

Maybe this community needs stricter posting guidelines to avoid this sort of drivel?

Except you can’t run it.

Every model You are downloading and running is simply just a checkpoint of llama…

Quit spreading that misinformation.

You, and the grand majority of everyone else, doesn’t have anywhere near the hardware to run the actual full deepseek model

Keep saying it as if it was never addressed because that’s what works.

If you say something enough times it is reality to the majority of the voter base in the US.

If you ignore all refutes logic or facts and simply steam ahead with your word being the only right word then that will become reality

Wait wut?!?

Is there a source you can link to?

Way too much for sure.

Just the business internet to get the foot in the door for a static IP 5x’s the cost of my Internet.

It’s actually cheaper to just have DC IPs and proxy through hosted containers. Which is kind of crazy.

Negative aspect is that DC IPs aren’t treated very nice.

No I think someone saying Google it is still worse.

The former is being intentionally unhelpful.

Your example is being unintentionally unhelpful.

Intentional malicious behavior is far worse than negligence.

Honestly nuclear isn’t a bad deal for that. Clean, sustainable, safe, compared to non-renewables.

Though old ass reactors seem sus.

Using compressed axes to display data was literally “How to identify misleading statistics 101” in middle school for us…

It seems fine to you but for the majority of people it’s misleading most people look at the lines and the relative distance between them to make judgment calls. Not literally the entire point of graphs, to visually display information.

This is a well-known effect and is taught in pretty much every major curriculum.

I honestly don’t have an answer to that but from my understanding running a web tunnel from your home IP can have negative consequences in relation to your address being flagged as a public proxy.

With the potential to be added to certain automatic ban lists. But more likely than not you’ll be added to a list of potentially untrustable addresses which means you’ll be doing a lot more CAPTCHAS in the future

I’m not sure what argument you’re making here yes of course parents should be teaching their children these skills instead of letting them go on social media.

How is that relevant to the argument that I’m making though?

This is obviously not occurring today so how do you expect it to occur tomorrow when we make no changes today?

You do realize that the children of tomorrow will be raised by the children of today right? And as we let the children of today become addicted to social media and don’t provide them with the tools skills and safety to protect themselves from social media how do you expect them to teach their children how?

Sure I may be cognizant of this but again, as stated previously in these messages…, this is a systemic problem. You cannot solve a systemic problem by putting the burden of solution on each individual involved in the problem. Systemic problems require systematic solutions, this is largely an inarguable point.

Well yeah that’s a problem of course but that doesn’t negate the reasoning I stated in other areas of this thread.

I’m not promoting trust in a central authority or government here that’s a separate problem that exists on an entirely different plane.

Yes you who probably has some amount of critical thinking skills can do that. The majority of young generational individuals today, cannot. Which largely negates the “well they should get gud” argument. It’s a systematic problem, you can’t solve systematic problems that way…

I’m not going to repeat myself though, my last paragraph in the previous message is a fairly succinct tldr. This is a principal that’s been applied and works across industries, and is critically important for building “safe systems”

Safe systems being systems that are designed to be operated and interacted with safely. There is a practical infinite number of safe systems that you can find examples of to further drive my point home. We can design systems that provide safety from human behavior and failings, the largest obstacle is usually both the political aspect and the aspect of individuals who refuse to acknowledge that safe systems are important.

Stop feeding the trolls…

End users really need to just be more skeptical.

That’s… The opposite of a solution.

This is how you make systemic problems worse, not better.

Humans are largely morons, you can’t fix this. But you can fix the systems they interact with to avoid their vulnerabilities from being taken advantage of.

Side note.

Social media is now a theater of war, with adults and children alike being the weapons created by way of social media propaganda.

Children, who are the most likely to be affected and manipulated, who are also primary targets due to said vulnerabilities should be excluded from these platforms for this reason alone.

This is a problem that’s growing at a scale to affect entire countries. Countries with populations vulnerable to social media targeting propaganda, astroturfing, and manipulation are vulnerable on the world stage.

Making this a growing national security concern for any country.

It most definitely is possible in federated networks to be clear.

Federated networks are extremely vulnerable to bots. And “organic” online narrative is easily manipulated with bots and bot driven content.

We see this in centralized platforms like Reddit which have mature and centralized bot detection and control mechanisms which are largely ineffective in an ideal scenario for them to be the most effective.

The only saving grace for federated services right now is that they are simply far too small to be worth the time and money to manipulate narratives on. The user bases are infinitesimal in comparison to mainstream social media.

This changes if their popularity skyrockets. The only thing it takes to manipulate opinions and narrative is money and a vulnerable target. The fediverse is largely a vulnerable target and current mega corporations have more than enough money to do what they need done a million times over.