If you believe you’re less likely to be in danger with a bear than a man, you’re just sexist.

Men have to make relationships happen. If they do not directly and obviously show interest and intent on pursuing a person they’re interested in, they will never have any sort of relationships. Ever.

There is nowhere that those people want you to meet people. They just want your (valid ) grievances with how much dating is shit to get out of their sight.

Not for people in their 20s.

Or maybe people don’t like being roped in with terrible people based on a part of them that they have no control over? Just a thought.

Mistake? It was intentional. Sanders represents a threat to the political establishment.

If you see people being radicalized and can't think of anything other than voting, you're part of the problem.

More broken windows. More. More.

They're both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it's owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

"In my household, the only addictive spyware we use is made in the USA!!!"

Edit: everyone below me is proving my point exactly.

Yeah but those uncomfortable facts get in the way of making china look scary for the next red scare

I don't think you understand my point.

Let's break this down by making up a hypothetical sexual history for the woman in question:

Guy 1 - Committed relationship, waited 3 months

Guy 2 - Casual fling, no waiting

Guy 3 - Committed relationship, waited 2 date

Guy 4 - Casual relationship, no waiting

Guy 5 - Hookup, no waiting

If, now that she's seeing guy 6, she magically decides it's time to be responsible and wait for a while. Any guy that has self respect isn't going to tolerate that. Why is this new guy so different than than the previous ones? Why does she make him wait, but none of the previous men?

Anyone is going to figure that she is 1. Not attracted to him and is settling down after having fun to secure stability, or 2. Has cognitive dissonance about her past. A guy not accepting that and being skeptical of her intentions or level of honesty is fully justified.

And for the record, I apply my principles evenly between men and women. Casual sex is disgusting and a long sexual history is a sign of impulsive, irresponsible behavior or placing no value on your body or relationships. Man or woman.

Men don't go for that because she didn't make previous guys wait until marriage.

Making rules for those you "settle" for that did not previously apply is egregious hypocrisy.

Being an ugly woman is not nearly the struggle that being an ugly man is. Women who aren't attractive need to approach at all and they'll have more success than ugly men who approach twice as often.

I recommend arch to a first time user…once. because he said he wanted to have Linux as a new hobby of sorts. Everyone else I recommend Pop! Or Fedora most of the time.

That's the worst drawing off a hammer and sickle I've ever seen lmao

Israelis believe they are above the law because their fake country is unconditionally supported by empire.

Paper towels. Nothing quite compares to bounty.

The constitution is only used to protect property rights of the owners and the power of managers. The working class is not often afforded it's protections.

I'm working class. Putting working class people who enjoy steak on the same level of the people that perpetuate capitalism in the name of sacrificing everyone for their own material benefit shows that you are a feckless liberal who cares about the appearance of progress, not actual progress.