Then would a check to everyone of an immigrant family be acceptable? Only people who’s family have never left the country are fit to protect it?

That feels like a violation of the 14th amendment, and ensures only redneck Republican hillbillies are the ones who ensure the safety of Americans.

What kind of North Korean “sins of the father” shit is this?

Punish him for his actions of helping Musk take over the government in a coup, not that his grandad did spycraft every nation did in the Cold War.

I don’t care if he was the grandson of Jesus Christ and Buddha if he is a dipshit fascist. Fascists get called out for being fascists, not being related to one they might have never known.

I don’t care who someone’s family is, their actions are what defines them.

If someone was the son of Hitler and they did massive charity work, I don’t care. If someone was the child of Theodore Roosevelt and murdered someone, I don’t care.

It’s weird that being the grandson of some random KGB is what matters here more than the fact they are aiding a fascist take over. Like it’s in their DNA.

My grandfather on my mother’s side was a Nazi. We’re unsure of it was willing or “everyone had be in Nazi Germany.” I still fight for the rights of minorities everywhere. His actions don’t speak for mine. Nor my mother’s.

Well I’d love to say shoot transphobes but that will get my comment removed.

It’s like the KKK and landlords. Reform or be removed.

A group of mask-on Trumps if you would.

Try not being a moron with idiotic takes, that works for me and millions of others.

Education and if they refuse to learn, anything else to ensure the safety of the others. Needs of the many outweigh the feelings of the few.

I wouldn’t mind being under Mexican rule, if they’re cool with a white nerd to eat more good food and give the middle finger to Trump.

Sounds more like progressive Dem on corporate Dem action to me.

Happens every day on .world honestly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance. This paradox was articulated by philosopher Karl Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945),[1] where he argued that a truly tolerant society must retain the right to deny tolerance to those who promote intolerance. Popper posited that if intolerant ideologies are allowed unchecked expression, they could exploit open society values to erode or destroy tolerance itself through authoritarian or oppressive practices.

This paradox raises complex issues about the limits of freedom, especially concerning free speech and the protection of liberal democratic values. It has implications for contemporary debates on managing hate speech, political extremism, and social policies aimed at fostering inclusivity without compromising the integrity of democratic tolerance.

Above room temperature IQ shit, please use the brain I assume you’re equipped with, but my faith in that is dwindling.

A wholesome community until you have a different opinion.

“Please tolerate my intolerance! You have to support me wanting people removed from the public! I’m normal!! You need to treat me equal while I don’t treat people equal, or you’re being hypocritical!!!”

“People are being hurt and we need to do something.”

“I don’t wanna, inconveniences me.”

“Then you’re not helpful, you’re at best not helping victims, at worst aiding in prolonging their pain.”

“Now you’ve lost me as an ally!”

Go bother someone else you can grift into thinking “the left got too crazy for me, so i left the left” as you claim you got cancelled and blacklisted as you make hundreds of thousands on right wing media.

This is what drives people further to the right. We’re not allowed to disagree with the trans agenda or have our own views on the matter.

“Ya know I stood for things like labor rights, marriage equality, women’s rights, and then I was told to respect people and stand up for their civil liberties and then I became more and more right wing, and abandoned all previous morals and ethics because someone said something mean to me online a few too many times.”

If I changed my mind on shit because someone was rude I’d never have a firm opinion on anything.

Correct, you help people who are being attacked, or you do nothing when they are being attacked.

TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS

THE WORLD IS BETTER WITH MY TRANS FRIENDS IT

AND THE WORLD IS DIMMER WITHOUT THEM

THE ONLY PEOPLE THE WORLD DOESN’T NEED ARE FASCISTS AND THEIR ENABLERS

AND THIS IS A THREAT TO ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE

I fail to understand why this gets downvoted …

Because you’re a moron who refuses to learn better.

Musk at least tried to pretend to be one of the “cool and good” billionares. Making fun tech, cool cars, the real world Tony Stark. Zuck never did.

And now Musk’s fans are licking his boots with Trump for a penny to trickle down to them.

“Less evil is better than more evil. Please ignore that Less Evil allows all of More Evil’s actions.”

Aren’t they “DINOs” when some have been in office for over a decade, with being re-elected with these expectations?

Why do you care so much what an article says about France’s accomplishments of science and China’s accomplishments of science? Why can’t we enjoy the movement of technology without bickering about lines drawn in the sand by people none of us know or care about?