No, but there’s an amendment that says you don’t need such an amendment:

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

We really are obsessed with replicating any and all sci-fi cautionary tales, aren’t we?

If Dolly Parton is politely asking you to stop being a shit, you’re a 100% certified shit.

Recent article that explains why the US Marshals would be a useful landmark:

Here’s One Big Way You’ll Know if We’re in a Presidential Dictatorship

The fundamental weakness of courts is that their orders have force only if people, including government officials, obey them.

…

[T]he increased procedural complexity of criminal contempt proceedings combined with the specter of presidential pardons renders criminal contempt an improbable recourse for the judiciary.

That leaves civil contempt, which, as noted, authorizes the imposition of fines, imprisonment, or both to compel compliance with judicial orders.

…

[T]he primary traditional function of the U.S. Marshals Service is to act as the enforcement arm of the courts.

…

Should the attorney general order the marshals and BOP not to enforce a judicial contempt order against an administration official, that would be an open repudiation of the rule of law and a plain declaration of presidential dictatorship.

Leads crowd in chanting “DO IT”, acts surprised when he does it.

US equivalent of DMA when?

“Did you see that high-scoring basketball game last night? The referee gave out so many points, he had to declare bankruptcy!”

They have a long history of using temperature to get customers not to linger.

Professionally argues in favor of treating immigrants like vermin

Personally believes in treating immigrants like vermin

shocked-pikachu-face

I wonder: Has this happened with anything else?

Where an older generation struggled to understand at all, a middle generation adapted to it early enough to witness all of the quirks, and then a later generation was born into an already-smoothed out system — and they all lived simultaneously?

Seems like a uniquely modern thing, but then again agriculture and clothing and currency have all had periods of rapid change in the past.

Like were there Generation F dudes out there like “omg we’re the only ones who understand knitting frames smh”?

Cuz mass storage was a quirky extra, not something essential to your system, like your A: floppy drive was.

“Slamming” became a stale trope once it became obvious that you can’t shame the shameless.

Stop trying to simply call out fascists. Start telling anti-fascists what to do about them.

Me: Trying to get my work done

News: Musk introduces new Pledge Of Allegiance To The Gulf Of America, to be recited by citizens whenever they buy eggs

Me: Fuck this, why am I trying…

Performance Review: You seem a little distracted

Me: Nope, super focused boss! (shit shit shit, I gotta catch up)

Gotta zoom in to see Mt. Ev

instution

Huh. TIL:

The looming obstacle to deployment of civil contempt against Trump’s merry band of constitutional arsonists is the reality that judges do not arrest or imprison people themselves. Nor does the judicial branch have its own armed employees to arrest those who defy its orders or its own jails in which to hold prisoners. Those jobs are performed by the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Prisons … which are both components of the DOJ and are thus subordinate to the attorney general, who is subordinate to Trump. Even an order imposing a fine can be enforced only against a noncompliant defendant by action of the Justice Department.

Pretty good article on why refusing to enforce a contempt order would really be the South Bank of the Rubicon.

Shorthand that works anywhere: sudo !!

I appreciate the reply! And I’m sure I’m missing something, but… Why can’t you just lie about the model you used?

Isn’t this still subject to the same problem, where a system can lie about its inference chain by returning a plausible chain which wasn’t the actual chain used for the conclusion? (I’m thinking from the perspective of a consumer sending an API request, not the service provider directly accessing the model.)

Also:

Any time I see a highly technical post talking about AI and/or crypto, I imagine a skilled accountant living in the middle of mob territory. They may not be directly involved in any scams themselves, but they gotta know that their neighbors are crooked and a lot of their customers are gonna use their services in nefarious ways.