That's most likely due to low rankings. Lemmy doesn't prevent it.

My guess: The kids who used Discord for gaming grew up, and just went with the familiar thing when starting new communities and projects.

Also, Discord did heavy marketing early on, until it carved out a network effect. So here we are.

On the bright side:

Aggressive garbage collection and automatic thread locking are optional settings in most web forum software I've seen.

Lemmy shares some of the important parts of Usenet, and could develop into something that comes close.

• Terrible format for archiving knowledge
• Terrible tool for retrieving knowledge
• Locks community access behind a corporate license agreement
• Hands control of community-created content to a corporation
• Prevents indexing by web search engines
• Antithetical to interoperability
• Privacy-hostile

A web forum is far better in most cases. If you can't manage to run your own, there are plenty of lemmy servers that will do it for you. Even an email list (with searchable archives) would be better than Discord.

If you have collaborative documents that outgrow the forum format, use a wiki.

If real-time chat is needed, irc or matrix.

A project hosting its community on Discord is a project that won't get my contributions.

I wonder how this trend will affect fuel use. Seems like a win for the environment.

he’s gone off the rails in the last 6-12 months - complaining about needing more linux devs

It's also ironic in light of his history of loudly bashing linux and linux game development.

I can't think of anything good to say about Tim Sweeney.

I might give Backpack Battles a try. It doesn't look like my usual style, but I heard there's some good strategy under the surface, and I like that it's made with Godot.

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Section 3: Disqualification from office for insurrection or rebellion

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Are there any 5.5 physical sourcebooks? Were they ever planned at all?

I haven't been following One D&D news, but I got the impression they were focusing on a subscription-only model, so I've been planning to stick with my 5e books or switch to an ORC-licensed system.

This is true in C, but not in D.

I just learned about that as well. I hope Larian dilutes or buys back Tencent's shares.

I struggle to think of a buyer that would be worse for the players than Tencent.

On the bright side, Hasbro's last big D&D blunder prodded the community into developing alternative gaming systems and licenses, so I think we'll be in good shape to carry on without the brand if this happens.

Booming Blade's damage scaling is the same as Toll the Dead, but with a smaller damage die.

However, since its effect depends on a weapon hit instead of the elf spellcasting ability (intelligence), I suspect it will proc more often than Toll the Dead for most melee Fighters. Seems like a good choice if you want to your cantrip to be for combat.

On the other hand, since a fighter has plenty of weapons for doing damage, you might consider picking a utility cantrip instead. How often you use it would depend on your play style and DM, of course, but in my experience, all it takes is a little imagination to get tremendous value from utility cantrips.

Here are someone else's thoughts on the wizard/elf cantrips. Keep in mind that they're probably considered in the context of a wizard casting them, rather than a fighter, but the points noted there are worth considering regardless.

It's written correctly. "All but" in the sense used here means almost. "All but certain" means a hair's breadth from absolute certainty.

(Also, "lose" is the word you were looking for; not "loose".)

Micron Technology, Texas Instruments, and GlobalFoundries count among other top contenders, WSJ added citing industry executives.

It's good to see they're not putting all their eggs in one basket.

So with normal use it should be fine for a few decades.

Considering that "normal use" can be so very different among different people/applications/climates, I don't put a lot of stock in assessments like that, but it is at least one prediction to compare against when we see what happens in practice. Time will tell.

I'm curious how long the current gen OLED consoles will be in use before they develop screen burn-in.

How about backing up that letter with some lobbyists?

How would you have to modify the process to make liquid soap, like Dr Bronners, and skip the molds?

dedent() can help with that.