Yeah, James Madison definitely made a mistake writing “and”, but also fuck the courts for that ruling.

I mean, it’s quite literally a Nazi fascist cult. No need to call it anything less

It’s mainly a mix of economic frusturation and a divide and conquer strategy by the rich in order to have the masses blame immigrants and people of other races/religions/genders/sexual orientations/etc. for all of their problems instead of blaming the elite class and capitalism. The lie of meritocracy being real also plays a big role here (“temporarilly embarrassed billionaires”).

There is another angle, though, and that’s sexual frusturation. When a teenage male has issues getting laid and they look online for some kind of support, they find people like Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson who tells them that men who “get laid” are “alphas” or whatever and that women should be treated as subhuman or as slaves. These incels have likely never actually attempted to make friends with any women outside of a sexual or romantic context, because if they did, they would learn that women are the same as them, even when it comes to their struggles (even pertaining to dating/sexual frusturations).

I think the latter reason (specifically Gamergate) sparked the fire that made the first truely possible on a scale that we haven’t seen in our lifetimes.

There is also the additional piece of info that the majority of people won’t take action against what is happening in politics until it personally affects them, which is a very unfortunate reality.

I hear Elon has been wanting to colonize Mars.

Cult. MAGA is a cult.

Not only was he illegally searched, but McDonald’s is likely engaging in illegal facial recognition based surveillance, possibly in collusion with the federal government.

No way a random McDonald’s worker could randomly point out that Mangione looks like the suspect, of which we had very few photos.

Not to mention the solitary confinement, although unfortunately, I’m not sure that’s illegal, even given the 8th amendment.

Why is Nazi in quotes?

Reuters has no balls

I hate how true this is. I still won’t personally engage in violence out of principle, but the populous as a whole can only take so much before not even Netflix can distract them any longer, especially when the fascist government actively engages in violent behavior against that same populous.

I also hate how most people don’t care about what’s happening until it personally affects them or someone they know. Like, it’s just basic empathy.

Even if Biden completely abolished ICE, Trump would have just created a new one.

Or Mullvad Browser, which is just the Tor Browser without Tor.

There’s also IronFox on Android which is more similar to LibreWolf than MV Browser.

Have you tried using a US English locale? Most AI models are trained mostly in English, so not sure if your locale being Dutch is affecting that.

Or in other words, Trump is a little snowflake.

And they were incorrect, unless they specifically supported him because of stuff like Project 2025, being massively corrupt, promising to give Elon power, bringing more devistation to Gaza, etc.

Also the democrats lost about 6 million votes, and Trump gained about 3 million vs 2020. That’s 3 million prior voters who just decided voting wasn’t worth it in just 4 years. How Trump gained those 3 million votes is beyond me, unless they never directly watched Trump speak in the entire campaign and only watched editorialized content, which is entirely possible, if not likely.

The media this past election cycle has proven to have an extreme conservative bias. The amount of sanewashing that occured with everything Trump said vs the extreme amount of scrutiny for everything Biden and Kamala said was disgusting to see. This includes all corporate media, including corporate-backed online media.

Compared to Trump’s dimentia-ridden campaign, which was probably the worst political campaign in American history? Yeah, the Democrats’ campaign was fucking perfect in comparison to talking about Arnold Palmer’s cock, giving a microphone a blowjob, or saying Haitian migrants are eating cats and dogs.

Yes, both parties are corrupt, and yes, there is no party offering true change in a socialist direction. One party is literally fascist, and is clearly worse. I hate voting for the lesser of two evils, but this was the easiest election decision I’ve made in my entire life.

We get it. We live in a shitty, gerrymandered two party system thanks to FPTP and there is no true anti-war or anti-capitalist party. What’s your point?

Saying “both sides bad” without mentioning one side being much, much worse is just being disingenuous. Not just that, but it attracts people on the worse side, who then will not accept criticism of their own side. Look at Jimmy Dore for a perfect example of this kind of audience capture.

In this example, you have Biden on one side, who was being complacent in a genocide while saying publicly that he wants a ceasefire deal, but not doing what was in his power to actually make it happen, like cutting off arms and funding to Israel. On the other side, you have Trump who wants to nuke Gaza and commit ethnic cleansing himself (I’m sorry, I meant to say “displace Palestinians”) and rebuild it as a paradise in his image without Palestinians.

Let’s just say Netanyahu publicly wanted Trump to win this past election, and there’s a good reason why.

It’s easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism.

“First they came for the communists…”

Says the person who didn’t engage on the substance of my post, but instead is attempting an ad hominem attack while downvoting because you disagree. Sure sounds like you lost the argument here, bud.

Note how I didn’t downvote you until you posted this, now that I understand that you are not arguing in good faith.

How much of that growth is bots?

You’re missing the point entirely. I’m saying the people I’m labeling as “good” don’t have ASPD, whereas the “bad” people I listed do.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/antisocial-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20353928

Your definition involving legality does not match up to the medical definition of ASPD, which is defined by morality. I think you’re getting confused because people with ASPD are often times also criminals, but the medical definition is not simply “a criminal.”

From the link above: “Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called sociopathy, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others. People with antisocial personality disorder tend to purposely make others angry or upset and manipulate or treat others harshly or with cruel indifference. They lack remorse or do not regret their behavior.”

Now tell me how Harriet Tubman had ASPD given that definition.

Or if you prefer the DSM-5, it’s on page 659: https://archive.org/details/APA-DSM-5/page/659/mode/1up

I think you’re getting hung up on that first point (A1), but three or more of those criteria must apply to be able to diagnose ASPD.