It indeed doesn’t work. Has been tried countless times. Whole eastern europe, North Korea, China and many more countries. It failed every single time because communism is a fundamentally broken system.

And please, don’t try to convince me that communism in the eastern bloc failed due to US.

So you would be happier getting abused by authoritarian regimes in North Korea, for example? Weird flex but okay.

Yes, those are definitely the best places to live. Especially compared to ugly capitalists states such as luxembourg or switzerland.

If US is the biggest obstacle to communism worldwide, then god bless america lol

Those advantages of women they have compared to men are literally nothing compared to the advantages men have. Here is an example where sisters Williams tried to beat ~350 man in world rankings and it just didn’t go well: https://www.tennisnow.com/Blogs/NET-POSTS/November-2017-(1)/The-Man-Who-Beat-Venus-and-Serena-Back-to-Back.aspx

Same for other sports. I used to to skiing and in junior leagues, men were seconds ahead of women on the same track.

Cmon… Imposing tariffs on your allies is not the way you build economy.

Why not. Maybe I would cap it at some number of elections.

Why? I think businesses should be left alone to decide.

Let’s blame it on white people!!!

Elon?

I think he should start with burning himself

You can buy a part of company. If you buy 0.00001% of that company, you surely won’t take part in the decisions as your vote does not matter. From the other side, if millions of people owning 0.00001% of the company were making decisions, it would have been very slow to respond to the competition.

It’s all quite simple. If you disagree with company’s management, just sell the stocks. And no one is saying that company’s stock will be worth more next month.

Imagine calling stocks a casino xD

Sure, if the CEO is replaced by someone else who can manage the company, sure. But you cannot generally expect people to manage themselves. That’s why communism never worked and never will.

Also, what is according to you a glorified casino?

So if I have a small computer repair store and want to make it more successful, I should employ at least million people, so the ratio goes up?

Company is not a charity. There is a difference.

Suppose that dropbox employs twice as many people as other cloud providers. Would you be willing to pay them the twice amount for the same product the competition offers just because they employ more people?

You know, we live in the world of competition where you need to be ahead your rivals, otherwise your company fails (and all employees lose their jobs). So cutting costs where it’s possible makes perfect sense, especially if the employees can be replaced by computers or sth.

Well, if dropbox can exist without those 500 employees, then it’s logical. You don’t judge success of a business by how many people it employs

Tesla and Elon are one of the reasons why I don’t but individual stocks but I rather get indices… It’s just the lack of consistency and the fact a single person can make you lose money…

I do not really see why this is bad. If they can exist with 10% less, why not.

If someone says, “I support this because I am conservative,” you actually mean, “I support this because I am a cock.”