The Ohio Republican party just made a brazen attempt to consolidate power (and failed).

They tried to effectively remove citizen initiatives, because the legislature doesn’t control those.

The “unfortunately” is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he’s determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason.

I understand people think it’s not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick.