𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐

[redacted]

Read the fucking Mueller Report. Both volumes.

Volume I is conspiracy and coordination.

Volume II is obstruction of justice.

Innocent people do not act like this.

Edit: spelling

Authoritarian Left sounds bad too, but it would nice if they executed the rule of law instead of making excuses to remain politically neutral.

And now Russia plays… Steven Seagal.

Time to play meedley-meedley on the thin strings and small frets.

He will sit so hard.

All one in the same.

If one doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose, they are taking away her autonomy. The face doesn’t matter. It is war.

No /s needed. They’ve been waging war on women.

They feel this way.

Full disclosure: You’ll notice an edit on my parent. I originally submitted isnt. No one is immune from the curse.

isn’t she’s

Meh. Pedant time.

The first step of every testcase is supposed to fail to ensure a testing framework can fail in the scope of the testcase. In practice nobody acknowledges this, much less incorporates it.

Without, one is forced to concede that the test environment is not sane—and, therefore, no case under test is certifiable—because it cannot be known, for certain, if failure was a possibility.

Nobody cares.

No kidding. Trump will definitely be coming after him.

We’ll see how funny it is in 13 days.

Oh, the guy that floated ingredient-to-bread ratio being more important than the election?

Get the fuck outta here.

Edit: This was the damn promo for his, then new, The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart podcast. I don’t have a sense of humor about trivializing this shit.

Edit 2: 20241106 after PA called for Trump - This is why.

Love the Wololo.

They’re his people.

Kamala had the majority of delegates needed for nomination in under 33 hours.

1.3 days.

Harris opted for liable of scamming, sexual abuse, and guilty of fraud on thirty-four counts instead of fraud, rape, and convicted of thirty-four felonies. Great start, but she should not shy from harsh rhetoric.

Just take 538 in aggregate.

Nate Silver still forecasts. You’re not losing anything.

There’s a lot more implication to her reaction when you hear the question she was asked.

The parent wasn’t looking for an explanation.

They were commenting on how hard your wetware bricked.

not being defined except for being confusing and possibly enraging

You just defined shitposting, my guy.

Are you sure you didn’t set low-detail with the viewport cranked way down? I played it on the same model with a math co-processor and it could not handle high-detail and the large viewport in the video.

Edit: I’m fairly certain I had a math co-processor, but I’ll defer to you on this detail just in case. That would certainly make a sizeable difference.