The bill contains many provisions legal experts say are likely unconstitutional, including one that says it can’t be challenged in state court.
The bill contains many provisions legal experts say are likely unconstitutional, including one that says it can’t be challenged in state court.
I think state rights should mean that a state has the ability the challenge the laws that govern it. This bill specifically has wording to prevent that, it’s the entire reason this article was posted. Please explain to me how stripping a states population of its rights to challenge a bill that governs them is suppose to be for their rights?