As a guy closing in on 50, losing my near vision really annoys me. And the current solutions are weak at best, which annoys me even more. These and the other companies working on similar sound great. But someone tell me why I would need a prescription for them? And is that true in the EU? The article makes it sound like getting them approved to be prescribed is a big hurdle. They seem like better reading glasses, which I don’t need a prescription to buy.

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Prescription glasses” only mean “glasses with optical properties”, so glasses that actually do anything with focus, as opposed to e.g. non-prescription sunglasses or non-prescription accessory glasses that people wear to look smart or something.

    It doesn’t mean you need a prescription for them.

    (That said: in some countries you need a prescription for your prescription glasses if you want your health insurance to pay for them.)

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    These need to be washable, otherwise every time I accidentally wear them into the shower I’m going to have to buy another pair.

  • coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    This is INSANE, my entire household could make imense use of theese with our shitty eyesight! I don’t cary about any reviews because anything like this will be 1000x better than existing bifocals, I will be preordering 3 pairs of theese as soon as possible. I just hope they don’t patent the shit out of them so there will be competitors and the prices won’t be astronomical.

  • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    A manual focus version would be cool too. I don’t like the idea of having yet another thing to charge.

  • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Interesting idea. I would buy one.

    Armed with fresh funding, IXI is now planning to ramp up R&D, expand its team of 50 people, and move into a new headquarters with a purpose-built lab and clean room facilities. The company plans to hold the first live demos of its glasses later this year.

    But maybe I shouldn’t hold my breath, yet.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    I don’t think I want it to be possible for someone’s glasses to die or freeze

    People do dangerous things that are made safer by the fact they can see—like driving

    Edit: you’ll need a prescription because the amount of focus it needs to do will be different for everyone and there isn’t a sensor to determine your eyesight

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, I have tried multiple sets of reading glasses at different magnification. They all work fine. So I don’t think it needs to be that exact to match the person. And I would think some sort of calibration, either by manual means or plugging them into a smartphone and using an app should cover that. I doubt it corrects for things like astigmatism that are more complex.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’d just keep a spare pair of normal glasses in the car. Anyone that has gotten to the point of needed glasses for both distance and reading likely has old pairs of glasses that can sit in a glove box. Even a slightly outdated prescription works in a pinch.

      Bifocals and or swapping between distance and readers is a fucking pain. Something that solves that automatically, without a medical procedure, would be fucking amazing.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I think I’m more concerned about the unfortunate scenarios where:

        Glasses fuck up meaning driver can only see near -> something that needs quick reactions happens to avoid someone dying -> driver is fumbling with glasses or trying to find a spare pair -> somebody dies

        • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          As a driver with short sight and glasses, if my glasses fall off I’m not suddenly blind - I just can’t read license places or signs. Traffic lights, other cars etc are still pretty obvious.

          • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            My sister can’t see the big E on the old school eye charts.

            My kid barely can, as well. They’re practically blind without glasses.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I also am short sighted, though possibly a bit worse than you given your description. If my glasses suddenly fell off there are plenty of hazards I would potentially miss. Idiot kid about to run into the road, etc.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Good point. Maybe these are a “home or office use only” device.

          I would looove to have something like this for work or home.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t either but I sure would like to be able to read stuff sometimes.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Is that the same as Progressives? I have them. I hate the areas that don’t work on the sides. People get used to them I guess, but I don’t have to wear mine most of the time. And even if you are used to it, that means you have some distorted peripheral vision when you wear them.

          • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn’t visible. If I focus there’s a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.

            To be honest I wasn’t aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Hm. Checking my glasses I think there is something on the top too. I can see distance ever so slightly clearer looking out the top. If I remember right, I have a minus .25 in one eye. Always been told it didn’t need correction, but maybe it is in this pair. I should go get some off the shelf progressive readers and try those.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can do that with this novel technology called “a second pair of glasses for reading”.

        Alternatively, if you don’t want to constantly adjust because you only need to read something quick, try taking off your glasses and squinting.

        Could save you thousands of dollars and hours on the line with technical support.

        • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You can do that with this novel technology called “a second pair of glasses for reading”.

          It works, I can confirm it.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          When I play a board game and need to read the cards I need glasses. But if I want to look at the player across the table I have to take them off. Squinting doesn’t seem to help.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Let’s be honest, swapping between two pairs of glasses, or rocking multi focal glasses, sucks.

          Carrying around glasses cases everywhere is a total PITA, and multi focals are not nearly as nice as one big dedicated lens for an entire focal point.

          I don’t know anyone carrying multiple pairs of glasses that thinks “this is great, the youths are missing out on all the fun.”

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Sounds great. I’m in my 40s with myopia, astigmatism, and more recently, presbyopia.

    Progressive lenses don’t work for me, and needing two pairs of glasses is not ideal, even if it mostly works. Plus I can’t even just buy reading glasses off the shelf, even my short range office lenses need a prescription and are expensive as hell.

    Autofocusing lenses sound like an awesome alternative.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    My GUESS would be that you get a prescription for whatever your vision requires as a baseline, then the auto focus kicks in for reading.

    The intention is to replace bifocals or progressives, so you’d still have your primary prescription + adjustment for reading.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I hope you are right. But I don’t have a perscription. So I would need clear by default, and only autofocusing for reading. I shouldn’t need a script for that.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That was my take, and I hope we’re both right. I’d kill for glasses that auto-focus as readers. I wear contacts most of the time when outside, so maybe not such a savior for me.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Because they are a medical device and there are negative medical repercussions to using glasses that don’t conform to your needed prescription.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I can go buy readers when I don’t need them. I’ve been told that using a higher power than you need is bad for you as well. And you can buy glasses online with no script. So I don’t think that reason would be valid.

  • TryingSomethingNew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Interesting concept, here’s hoping. They could definitely take a bite out of the progressive market, especially for people who buy a pair of dedicated reading glasses. Comes down to how much lenses cost, how much/many options the frames come with… I suspect this will be a super niche thing, but on board for it

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And prescriptions for glasses in general bug me. The only argument for requiring them and having them expire I have heard is that the wrong perscription could be dangerous while driving and such. But heck, we don’t make you retake the drivers test every 2 years, and people’s driving skills certainly decrease with age. So why prescriptions? Seems like another one of those good for business and not for people laws.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      How do prescriptions for glasses even work on your side of the pond? I assumed it was just jargon of a sort, because round these parts I just go to a glasses seller and ask him for his strongest glasses. Then he says “no traveller, my strongest glasses are too strong for you, you can’t handle my strongest glasses” and does the eye test with me before making lenses at the proper strength.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        You go to an eye doctor, they do the various tests and create a prescription with the necessary details to get you the right glasses. For the next year, you can use that prescription to buy glasses anywhere you want.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        True for glasses, illegal for contacts. It’s the dumbest shit ever. I don’t need a prescription for band aids, why do I need one for eye correction?

        $$$

        • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          For contacts I kinda get it.

          You could have eye conditions that make you unsuitable to use contacts.

          For glasses, its absolute bullshit.

          An “incorrect” lens placed on the exterior of your face will not harm you (other than making you a bit dizzy).

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            The thing is, if you’re eyes are unsuitable for contacts, you’ll know really quickly. I would think almost anyone that would buy contacts without an active prescription, has already tried contacts. You still have to know the numbers, so at some point there was an active prescription. I’ve never been to an eye doctor that didn’t give free contacts samples, so there’s that option too.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Can’t you buy colored contacts with no correction? Seems like if you can do that, the issue with your ryes being unsuitable isn’t the reason.

              • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Valid point. Which makes it even dumber that I can’t buy corrective lenses with a prescription a doctor once gave me that arbitrarily expired. It’s not like eye prescriptions tend to change significantly, and if it’s like other drug prescriptions, no need to worry about me growing an addiction to contacts, I’m already there.