Edit: obligatory explanation (thanks mods for squaring me away)…

What you see via the UI isn’t “all that exists”. Unlike Reddit, where everything is a black box, there are a lot more eyeballs who can see “under the hood”. Any instance admin, proper or rogue, gets a ton of information that users won’t normally see. The attached example demonstrates that while users will only see upvote/downvote tallies, admins can see who actually performed those actions.

Edit: To clarify, not just YOUR instance admin gets this info. This is ANY instance admin across the Fediverse.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    285
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    To anyone surprised at this: welcome to the fediverse, please treat everyhing you do or say as public.

    The way to achieve privacy around here is by following the long forgotten arts of the old internet before Facebook was a thing: use a Nick name and don't tell strangers on the internet your real identity.

    Your home instance will act as a proxy and only they have access to your email and IP address. That does stay private.

    So, as long as you trust your home instance to not leak or disclose your connection or sign up data (which would be illegal in EU countries), just sign up with an alias.

    A very positive aspects of this is that it should allow us to detect voting manipulation by correlating the activity of certain potentially malicious actors. If Lemmy instances take vote manipulation seriously and do their best to block bots this has the chance to make Lemmy / Kbin much more transparent and credible than Reddit ever was.

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Lol. kids these days would post their bank info online if the banks didn’t prevent them from doing so.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I whole heartedly agree with this perspective.

      Additionally, and this is an unpopular opinion, but trying to maintain a Nick or online identity over many years is folly. You end up with a huge repository of personal information, increasing the risk that it can be connected to you personally.

      • NorwegianBlues@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        This has come up as part of those requests to migrate accounts between instances. “I want a persona that stays with me for years”… Is that actually a good idea though!?

    • BitOneZero @ .world@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Your home instance will act as a proxy and only they have access to your email and IP address.

      Your home image typically doesn’t proxy image loading, those are hotlinked to the Lemmy server that the image was uploaded to. So your IP address and browser string are going to other Lemmy servers.

      • azuth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The posts just contain a URL which doesn’t include the uploader’s ip address or their browser string.

        • BitOneZero @ .world@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          When the browser loads that URL, hotlinked image, that server has to have your IP address to return the results. Just browsing posts those images are being loaded.

          • azuth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Of course. They dont get any info to associate your IP with your lemmy account. You could even not have a lemmy account at all.

          • azuth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Of course. They dont get any info to associate your IP with your lemmy account. You could even not have a lemmy account at all.

    • kaba0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, an alias will only give you pseudo-anonymity. Even trivial analysis like counting which words occur together frequently in your writings can reveal with very good accuracy any other alt of you, so the available information of you is basically everything you have shared online with enough accompanying self-written text.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also, it’s not just about privacy, it’s about retaliation. It will be the easiest thing in the world for people to put together bots that will track the downvotes on every post they make and automate adding those people to block lists. Suddenly a whole fleet of alts is invisible to the people that would disagree with them.

    • Yaxoi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The thing is, there is really no way to know is trustworthy as a home instance…?

  • booty_flexx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    278
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    To illustrate op’s point I’m going to spin up an instance, federate with everyone, and not tell anyone what that instance is.

    Then I’m going to feed all that data into my new website, called Open Lemmy Stats, where anyone can query the user data ive accumulated. The homepage will be ripe with insights, leaderboards and all kinds of data on prolific users.

    Additionally, I’ll display a snapshot/profile of a random user by feeding that users data to GPT4 to make inferences about the user’s political affiliations and display the results.

    Worst of all, I’m not going to out my instance for everyone to know it as the one to defederate. In fact I’m spinning up a few instances that will host innocuous communities that I plan to mod and support to give my instances cover for their true purpose: redundant fediverse datastreams for my site, Open Lemmy Stats.

    I’ll also have a store where anyone can buy my collected fediverse data for a handsome sum.

    Just kidding I’m not doing any of this. But someone absolutely will or already is.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Reading these comments, seeing so many excuses, sarcastic responses, and handwaving, makes me realize a great deal of users really need to develop some imagination.

    This is not about privacy. It’s about data that can easily be used for targeting and profiling users, and how that creates countless avenues for targeted harassment and wide scale retaliation. It’s about all of the innumerable ways public vote information can and will be abused to manipulate scoring across the site with targeted/automated shadow banning and shared blocklists. Raise your hand if you trust every single admin to never abuse such a tool to curate the outward appearance of an instance to fit a narrative.

    For a different example: I could say something about how great Nazis are right now, and have a bot programmed to read every single person that downvoted me, add those names to a shared blocklist, and viola, I’ve made myself and all my alts invisible to the people that would challenge me on a massive scale.

    I promise you this is going to be a big issue as tools for this site get more sophisticated over time.

    • DurianLongan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      I could say something about how great Nazis are right now, and have a bot programmed to read every single person that downvoted me, add those names to a shared blocklist, and viola, I’ve made myself and all my alts invisible to the people that would challenge me on a massive scale.

      Damn

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      While I agree this shouldn’t be so publicly accessible, I’m curious about the possible benefits of limited sharing between instances to give spam/bot detection tool’s more power.

      Users on A vote on a post on B. The admins from A and B can see the fine details of who did what, but the admins of C (and all of the general users regardless of instance) just see totals of up/down votes.

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ideally, detecting bots should be up to the Admins. They should have access to the vote information, and they can share the tools with other admins to detect it. But the average user should not have unrestricted access to this data.

          • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Let me be a little more clear, the Admins of your account’s particular instance should be the only ones that have access to your votes.

            Now the question remains about when your account posts/comments into a different instance, who should have access to those votes? Perhaps your instance has a way of obfuscating the votes of any user coming from your instance, or else only the admins of the community that you’re posting into will have access to your votes?

            The problem really comes down to how we avoid the problem with duplicating votes. Currently this is easy as each vote is public so every instance can verify the correct vote count. But implementing either of the solutions above will need a way to verify the correct number of votes.

            To top it off you would also need a way to detect if a malicious instance had come along and started lying about how many votes had been cast.

            One thing we can look at under the hood would be how cryptocurrency works as they have solved both the problem of duplicate values as well as the ability to trust those values being sent. All of the code is free and open source so we can pick out the parts that we need and reuse it. (And no, I’m not telling people to go out and buy crypto).

            Z Cash would be a particularly good one to look at as it ensures a “zero knowledge” (or “zero trust”) method of sending the values across “nodes” (or in our case “instances”). Using this, who is voting on what would be hidden, but we could ensure that the values are correct.

            Additionally you could probably throw out the second hashing algorithm altogether and just keep the Blake2b hashing algorithm as this one is far more efficient and quick to compute (and that second algorithm was mostly thrown in to prevent people with specialized hardware from being able to come in and beat anyone else running on just a GPU/CPU). https://github.com/zcash/zcash

            However, using this particular method would make it so that not even the instance admins would be able to view the details of anyone’s votes (which may be a good thing after all if we decide that any random instance admin is not to be trusted).

            • sauerkraus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              There’s no need to complicate things by bringing crypto buzzwords into it. It’s already been solved faster, better, and easier just like everything else cryptobros invent a problem for.

              • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 years ago

                The crypto example was only a suggestion because they have simply solved the exact same problem we are looking at: duplicate votes (transactions) and verifying the results while being able to hide it.

                I would love to hear any other suggestions that people may have that solve these problems. Copying open source code from crypto isn’t the only option. So let’s look for solutions instead of dismissals (unless you’re arguing for keeping votes public of course).

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      alternatively, if votes were private, you could spin up a bot network to mass upvote your comment; making it far more influential as most people are more inclined to believe statements they think others also feel. thankfully, votes are open, so you can’t

      as long as there is a system, people will try to game the system; and when there is a new system, people will come up with new games

    • Boz (he/him)@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree with you about harassment issues, and the importance of controlling the transfer of admin-level data between instances, but for your last scenario, doesn’t blocking only apply to users who are logged in? Assuming your hypothetical tankies and Nazis were actually posting as well as blocking, it would be easy to find them just by logging out, and there are a lot of ways to get them banned or otherwise counteract their activities that don’t require someone to interact directly with them while logged in. The case you’re describing is not the kind of situation where the most important action is to argue with them. Arguing with extremists usually just validates their delusions, and encourages them to keep doing what they’re doing.

  • RyanHx@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    People raise a good point that in countries where political dissent can actually be dangerous, this would very much dissuade people from voting on things they believe in, or even coming anywhere near Lemmy period.

    A better approach I think would be to have the user’s host instance save their votes (the database obviously needs to remember what you voted on), but when federating those votes with other instances just hand over a cumulative total, e.g., “here on vlemmy.net we have +18 votes for this comment”, which the other instances can then add. There’s no need to send user information with that data.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem that Reddit realized early on is that user voting is the engine behind the content aggregation. That aggregation is one of the main selling points of Reddit. The more users vote on what they see, the more information Reddit has for how to aggregate that content. That’s what keeps the front page fresh, that’s what keeps content moving up and down on the site. In a very real sense, the voting is the heart pumping blood through the site.

      So it behooves the site to not give any reason for users not to vote how they feel. Keeping votes private was part of that. It is one of the most basic tenets of democracy: the only way to give people the freedom to vote honestly and frequently is to give them the privacy to do it.

      The potential for retaliation against users, in any number of conceivable ways, far outweighs any benefits that come from making votes public.

      The voting information also makes it insanely easy to automate mass blocking of any opinion under the sun. Nobody in this thread seems to grasp all the things you can do with that data to manipulate user interactions on this site. If you think troll armies are bad, wait till those troll armies have a shared automated block list of every single person that has ever downvoted them.

    • Feirdro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agreed, especially because I believe we’re headed for a repressive regime here in the US in about 2 years.

      Places like this will need to get very careful if they want to remain bastions of free speech and places where people can come to find the information that will no longer be available in mainstream channels.

    • Paradox@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Pretty easy to make an instance that would auto vote certain things with suspicious amounts of votes

      As it stands now, they have to fake the origin of some of those votes. Not much of a barrier, the fediverse generally accepts any user an instance says exists, but still, it’s a barrier

      And of course any instance thats blatantly manipulating votes is going to be defederated, but I’m more concerned with an instance that behaves normally until it encounters a keyword or user is been set to, and then gives their posts a -5 or whatever

      • Distributed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This was my thoughts as well. I understand the need for an audit trail.

        Would be very easy to build up an interaction graph with this data that could be used for fingerprinting. If this is an issue for you, though, just browse without signing in/interacting

        Was just thinking about this more though, and unfortunately there can also be rogue instances that allow bot users to be created and interact with other instances posts, so this issue could still persist.

        • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Could replace the usernames with UUIDs, and keep the username-UUID map back on the source instance? Then you get an audit trail, but not associated with user identity. There’s also no guarantee that people don’t use bob_jones as their username, and this is Personally Identifiable Information, which brings up some GDPR stuff too.

          • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.winOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 years ago

            The problem with that is that every interaction that any user has with a post or a comment would require calls back to the home instance in order to lookup those usernames. That’s a LOT of extra load

              • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yeah I just meant for the votes. If you make a comment with your username it’s pretty clear you consented for the input and the username to be visible side by side.

          • shagie@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            Source instances can be seized ( https://kolektiva.social/@admin/110637031574056150 ).

            UUIDs aren’t “invested” enough. Interacting with a name rather than 08d86062-730b-4081-8c4c-b28bca1713b6 or c4e1261a-087a-448d-bd3f-5c3d8ab28aab is desirable.

            GDPR will be interesting in the fediverse as once it’s out there it is really hard to remove/redact on all the other servers that the post has been federated with. It is a problem akin to sending an email to a mailing list and then asking everyone on that mailing list to delete that email… and forward that deletion request on to anyone they forwarded your email to and ask them nicely to do the same.

    • astral_avocado@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think those users who live under oppressive governments should be used to using tools like Tor and accounts with a proton email to interact on the internet.

      • RyanHx@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Fair point. Though if nothing else stripping out usernames from vote counts would maybe save some bandwidth or database queries for the instance.

  • ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Not to sound harsh or anything, but those of you saying that it’s okay that all this data is public are insane. This completely goes against the entire philosophy of the Fediverse and FOSS in general. The reason we all are fleeing from Big Tech is because they collect so much data on us. At least, they keep it hidden from public view. This is a major issue in my opinion, and needs to be addressed ASAP before we can claim to have superior platforms on the Fediverse. Why can’t this data at least be encrypted?

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Edit: Obligatory RIP my inbox.

    Can we leave this kinda stuff behind? It is NOT obligatory.

  • sebi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So any instance admin can analyze all users upvotes/downvotes and possibly derive political standpoints, likes/dislikes, opinions and location data from it

  • JshKlsn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Redditors already scream at people when they get a downvote and blame it on the person that replies to them, even if that person didn’t downvote them.

    I can see this being dangerous and leading to a lot of bullying. I know k-bin already publicly shows this. I can see who downvotes my comments/posts when I open up the post in a k-bin instance, without even being a member.

  • dukk@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Couldn’t we just use a hash for the usernames instead?

    Nothing too over the top, but just a simple hash and match that instead?

    Also, there’s way too much trust in instances. Like, one person could easily make a post on lemmy.world, go on their personal instance, and just give themselves, say, 2000 upvotes.

    Instances should have their own settings on what instances are allowed to keep a local copy. (Default behavior should be to get the post itself from the instance “hosting” it).

  • MissingNo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    At first I agreed with the general “whatever” sentiment. It has some important implications, however.

    It discourages people from voting if they’re concerned about other people seeing their activity. This could result in a lower quality of scoring for posts.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It discourages people from voting if they’re concerned about other people seeing their activity. This could result in a lower quality of scoring for posts.

      I strongly disagree with that. I think showing downvotes makes your votes more relevant. If something has 10k up votes and 10k down votes, it’s probably a decent post. If it just shows 10k up votes, or 0 net total, the score doesn’t reflect the nature of the post.

      At the individual level, it lets you know if someone is just trolling. That’s also a plus as far as reputation goes (not sure how people are scored here, or if they are).

      • OmniGlitcher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I agree with what you’re saying, but that’s not the point of this post. This post is about the fact that an individual user’s vote history is semi-public.

        i.e. if you were to upvote my comment, anyone who owns an instance would be able to see it was you who upvoted it. Likewise for if you downvote it.

        Whilst I’m sure there are those who don’t care, I’d personally rather not have any rando who can be bothered to set up a Lemmy instance know what I’ve voted on. I’d honestly rather just not vote.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It might also increase quality though. If people downvote out of spite and now it can be proven that they did, they might not do it and thus remove “bad” downvotes from the pool.

      I still think in total it’s probably better that they can not be seen, since anonymity usually gives more honest opinions.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I disagree, a lot of people troll-downvote meaning they downvote content that they don’t like, or just downvote because it’s already low score. Same also happens with upvotes and content that shouldn’t be upvoted. If you’re concerned with other people seeing your vote history you probably shouldn’t be making those votes.

      Semi public voting discourages this form of misconduct because people who want to can audit their history and see that they’re a troll.

      • noworriesimaracoon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I disagree, a lot of people troll-downvote meaning they downvote content that they don’t like, or just downvote because it’s already low score.

        Is there a valid reason, according to you, to use the downvote button? I’m really interested in knowing.

        • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The accepted reason for downvoting since early Reddit times is content that either doesn’t contribute to discussion or is factually false. Downvote was never meant to be a disagree button, but I am sure we’ve all broken that rule occasionally.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Exactly. It seems everyone here is of the impression that voting is for agree/disagree. That sucks and it’s simply impossible to fix.

        • sauerkraus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Downvoting has always been an indicator that you disagree in some way. Whether it’s a disagreement with the substance or format never mattered. You’ll sometimes see people jump through hoops trying to justify how their form of disagreement is the only valid one though.

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        You do see how it could have a chilling effect on engagement if the “someone” judging you negatively for your vote is, say, a repressive government, right? And what’s the point of a social network without engagement?

        • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Exactly.

          “I see you up votes posts about my election rival… see you soon!”

          “Dear child, I see you up voted LGBT content. Let’s talk about your sins, then try some electroshock”

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m already questioning the whole system behind it, not just votes.

    Say you have critical information that you want to delete but other instances can just ignore this deletion request, than I could technically write a plugin that uses an extra instance, to always display all deleted comments to me, despite me being a regular user.

    For other sites you’d need a crawler, catching this information and all this in a rapid fashion to be usable, with a lot of programming extra work.

    At this point we can as well remove the option to delete or edit a comment as everyone can host their own, which wouldn’t be possible with proprietary tools.

    If someone can simply see votes the same way, we can as well add a mouse hover function that will display the username of whoever upvoted.

  • madsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good find, albeit a bit horrifying.

    I wonder what the GDPR implications of this is. As far as I understand, even free, privately run services are required to abide by GDPR and offer data insight and deletion. They’re also required to state clearly what happens to user data.

    Edit: Apparently people have varying takes and feelings on what the GDPR does and does not say, so I urge you to please read the summary of GDPR data privacy here: https://gdpr.eu/data-privacy/ as well as the summary of what constitutes personal data here: https://gdpr.eu/eu-gdpr-personal-data/ It’s easier to have a good and fruitful discussion if we talk about what the GDPR actually says.

  • Virtual Insanity @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is a fundamental misunderstanding here.

    Our data has never been ‘invisible’… We’ve just trusted that places like Reddit and their staff will do the right thing. That’s literally how it already works.

    If you sign up for Reddit, Reddit staff can see your posts and votes if they want to.

    If you sign up for a private forum the admin there can also see database contents.

    One way encryption is not possible without stopping functionality… If data about you was encrypted then posts you make couldn’t be displayed. If you include a means to decrypt then there was no point encrypting anyway.

    This is how it’s always been, and Lemmy doesn’t change this status quo much.

    A faceless corporation that has had access to your data is just replaced by a variety of admins distributed across instances.

    This isn’t a good or bad thing, the potential for abuse does exist, but when we have literally made agreements with places like Reddit that they can use and sell our data… then what difference does it make it an admin takes a peek?

    It wouldn’t be great… but nothing is perfect.

    It’s still worth working on however, to see if a better solution can be found, but at this time I’d say just be aware that it is possible that your data can be seen and understand the only safeguard against that if you need to communicate something private would be to use direct messaging with end to end encryption.

  • AncientMariner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So when Threads decides to federate, they can slurp all this information.

    That would be massively concerning and that should be blocked. Ideally votes should remain only on the current instance. Anything shared with other instances should be anonymised. This would need to be re-architected imho.

    People come here to get away from Reddit now that trust has gone. Trust and a feeling of safety is vitally important to continue to build this platform.