• Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think I figured out one reason Trump is going after Greenland. It looks huge on a Mercator Projection map even though it isn’t that large.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Look at it, it’s almost as bit as Africa! We haven’t found who is the president of Africa, so we had to make do with Greenland though.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is one and only one reason Trump/US wants Greenland. With US out of NATO, it is a point closer to Europe to threaten Europe. Every other explanation is a disgusting lie, and of zero value to US.

      • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I always understood it as trump wanting the natural resources that Greenland has, along with it being positioned in a future ultra strategic location for arctic trade. like if the polar ice caps melt in the summer then countries close to the north pole will be able to send more ships easily, making any land around chokepoints in this trade more valuable - like Greenland

        not saying I like any of this stuff, but this is what I’ve heard

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Every piece of land can be useful. US’s current friendship with/lordship over NATO would get any project it wants done, and allow any shipments/trade routes to/from America. Project value is overblown due to high development costs and distance to markets.

          The reason you will hear economics and defense from enemies motives, is that is the sweetest sounding lie. It would increase the purchase price if Denmark citizens knew that Denmark government and its king are selling to US to improve its capabilities to murder all Danes.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It wouldn’t be very strategically important to the US on its own, but it currently is strategically important to NATO and harmful to Russia.

        Getting NATO out of Greenland is Putin’s order.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Absolutely absurdity that has to stop. Greenland is far away from Russia. Fine, some possible ICBM missile trajectories go over Greenland, but NATO is not going to stop US from putting missile shield or offensive nukes in Greenland, as long as it stays under NATO oversight. The Putin Derangement Syndrome that extends to explaining all Trump actions as gifts to Russia needs to stop being said out loud. Pure CIA disinformation to somehow brainwash Europe into accepting this.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s about Naval access to the Atlantic. The Russian Navy has to go between Greenland and Norway. With NATO controlling both sides, they don’t have a route to the Atlantic through friendly waters.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              There are international waters between Iceland and UK. When US is part of NATO, with as a matter of fact, dictatorial control over NATO, ownership of Greenland doesn’t matter. It is only a severance of US/NATO alliance that makes Greenland matter.