cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/18210719

Archived

Facebook is banning posts that mention various Linux-related topics, sites, or groups. Some users may also see their accounts locked or limited when posting Linux topics. Major open-source operating system news, reviews, and discussion site DistroWatch is at the center of the controversy, as it seems to be the first to have noticed that Facebook’s Community Standards had blackballed it.

[…]

DistroWatch says that the Facebook ban took effect on January 19. Readers have reported difficulty posting links to the site on this social media platform. Moreover, some have told DistroWatch that their Facebook accounts have been locked or limited after sharing posts mentioning Linux topics.

If you’re wondering if there might be something specific to DistroWatch.com, something on the site that the owners/operators perhaps don’t even know about, for example, then it seems pretty safe to rule out such a possibility. Reports show that “multiple groups associated with Linux and Linux discussions have either been shut down or had many of their posts removed.” However, we tested a few other Facebook posts with mentions of Linux, and they didn’t get blocked immediately.

[…]

Addition to include the DistroWatch link: https://distrowatch.com/weekly-mobile.php?issue=20250127#sitenews

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Did not expect “Linux users” to be this early in the stanzas of “First they came for the […]”

    • _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I mean, Linux literally runs the world, so if this is the best he can do, not even my bunny slippers are gonna be spooked.

      • probably2high@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think we’re about to see FOSS under siege by the technocrats, and it’s going to be depressingly effective since most people have no idea why it’s so fundamentally important to the world of tech.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Go and read original Distrowatch post and tell me this doesn’t sound like a plausible and way more boring explanation.

    • There is an ongoing US-China trade war that started 2 presidents ago.
    • Mark Zuckerberg wants to fellatio Donald Trump (hence dropping pretence of social responsibility).
    • Mark Zuckerberg wants to participate in this trade war somehow so he bans mentions of Chinese tech.
    • Distrowatch mentions OpenKylin, a Chinese Linux distribution, gets flagged.
    • Facebook support (person making around $3.5 per month in some third world country) doesn’t know difference between specific Linux distro and Linux itself, tells Distrowatch that Linux is now banned.
    • Distrowatch doesn’t research anything and cries foul without second thought because Meta is evil.
    • We live in everyone is dumb timeline.
  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    My conspiracy theory: Meta has an AI that scans articles/the internet for threats and then adjusts the filters for Facebook. The AI just read the story that some Games companies are blocking Linux clients, because they see them as unsafe. The AI just copied what it read.

    • ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I agree. It’s like Occam’s Razor, but with stupidity instead of simplicity: the most stupid reason is the most likely.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Hanlon’s razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity (or incompetence).

          This works for individuals, but when it comes to corporations, you really have to ask, why not both?

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Schrodinger’s Razor:

          The answer is both really smart and really stupid, but you won’t know which until you look at the source.

          • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Microsoft’s Schrodinger’s Razor

            The answer is both really smart and really stupid, but you won’t know which until you look at the source, and you can’t view it.

  • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I mean they are not wrong, Linux is a very big threat of good cyber security which makes it harder for them to collect information. I am not at all surprised that Facebook views cyber security practices as a threat( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • probably2high@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      My initial instinct is that it’s not about security (obviously), but the beginning of the attack of FOSS, since China dunked on everyone with their AI model, that can now be used by anyone freely while performing similarly (with the appropriate resources) rather than the ever-growing product making you pay for their useless snake oil.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        You’re definitely onto something. This isn’t the first time corporations have targeted FOSS, but because Linux is gaining in popularity we’re starting to see the old FUD and EEE tactics come back into play.

        Once we start seeing more normal people using it, primarily women, we’ll also see tons of misinformation that exists to sow the seeds of doubt in their minds.

        Probably something like the old “mac vs. PC” commercials but with “windows vs. linux”

  • ne0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Are there really that many Linux users discussing on Facebook? My brothers in Open Source, there are much better places even without this ban…

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Probably more like people complaining about Windows, and others recommending a switch to Ubuntu or something.

  • Doolbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is the first shot

    Even though almost every big tech company uses Linux on the backend they don’t want you to use it.

    Think of Peacock not letting people running Linux be able to use their application.

    It’s free and open source, and the powers to be don’t want anybody to have that.

    You can do what you want with it if you are willing to learn about it. Governments don’t like that.

    I may be wrong, but I see more of this coming.

  • _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    We’ve been on the receiving end of attention like this from Microsoft for longer than Facebook has been a thing, if Zuck thinks this is gonna make a dent in things, he’s mistaken.

    • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Remember the first time I read about Linux (long time ago) and they were basically calling it a communist os (not even joking) first site on Google at the time was all about how it was unpatriotic to use it etc.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Probably not in the sense that the average American uses the word “communist”, which is more about their remembered history of authoritarian regimes of the USSR and mid 20th century China and those sorts. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and the atrocities thereof.

          Linux is communist insofar as it is open source, and therefore less affected or tied up in capitalistic practices. Capitalists still use and contribute to Linux, but often those contributions go back into the commons of the open source code.

          You probably know all that, I’m just feeling long winded.

  • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Who hurt Facebook? This must be some unintended issue or else what do they have to do with Linux? Facebook has 0 reasons to do it

    • _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      You mean besides the fact that Linux gives power and choice back to the user, and that goes against everything Facebook stands for?