• Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What a bizarre system. Tax should be taken from your payslip. There should be no need for the individual to figure out anything, unless they are self employed.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s how it is here in France. It is calculated according to the previous year income, so if you get a raise you’ll have to pay a little bit more at the end the following fiscal year, but that’s often very little. Last time I got a 2500€ yearly raise, I had to align something like… 100€ 😆.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Why, though?

        I’m in Germany and my employer kind of knows how much they pay me. So they can easily calculate the income tax correctly. It’s just assumed that each month’s salary is 1/12th of my yearly income and taxed appropriately.

        You can literally live your entire life without “doing taxes” even once (though it’s a good idea for your individual deductions).

        • aln@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          We are taxed on more than just wages. Additionally, the way tax law is structured here, because of S-corporations and partnerships (structures which own/run companies), these both flow through activity to the individual tax payer which is then taxed at that level.

          If it’s just wages, lots of Americans work 2, 3, or even more jobs (not just during the year, but at once). Our tax rate tables are set up so you calculate them based on you having one job, so when we start a job it’s calculating it at only that one income.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          43 minutes ago

          Even in Germany you typically get a little money back if you do your taxes as a regular employee. Though that’s far, far better than owing the state money at the of the year.

        • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          Might be because of tax brackets and not knowing ahead of time if you’re getting a raise. E.g. maybe you are the top of some bracket for most of the year, and youre on track for not surpassing it by the end of the year. Then you get a raise near the end and it bumps you over.

          Should they take a huge amount off your last couple payslips? Or just let you pay it in taxes later?

          Might be better for some people to pay via taxes instead of automatically losing the money for that month.

          Just a guess though.

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            That’s a solved problem, though (and I described it in my comment). If you always assume the current month’s payment is 1/12th of your yearly salary, you already pay according to the tax bracket relevant to you. You might overpay a bit, but most people don’t double their income within a year, so the refund is typically not that much.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          52 minutes ago

          I agree that the employer part should be more automatic, but don’t forget it may not the the only income. You can have properties, you can have share and dividends. All that do not happen all at the same time, so it is far easier to calculate on an earlier snapshot than continuously recalculate every time something changes.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Income tax always struck me as a deliberate way to make your average joe hate taxes when they could, very easily, be calculated at time of payroll without you ever being shown the “pre tax” amount.

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t care about seeing the amount or not. I care that I have to deliberately set up my withholdings incorrectly to hopefully not end up owing too much more at the end of the year. If I set it up accurately I would end up owing thousands more.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I’m not sure how withholdings works for your paycheque, but you request where the number is set.

          If I set it up accurately

          You define what’s accurate for a percentage when you set it.

          • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, it’s a shit show over here. You kinda guess at how much you will need to pay in taxes, hold back that amount in your paycheck, and hope for the best. And if your life situation changes or the incoming government fucks around with the tax codes, your estimating will be off. Getting it down to a very small refund is the optional solution, but it’s not always as easy as you’d think.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              A lot of things suck, but setting up your withholding is easy, and in 30 years of paying taxes, I’ve never accidentally withheld too little.

              • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I hadn’t. I’ve also withheld to much and got a warning letter from the IRS. It’s at a point now where things have been optional for the last few years. But with the new tax changes Trump is bringing in, I expect I’ll go from getting a small refund to owing a bit next year.

  • MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In the country where you don’t know what you ll end up paying unless you go to the counter, because the taxes are not included, its only “logical” to not have your taxes deducted from your payslio because reasons

    I ll never understand this shit, smh

    • TheRtRevKaiser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m not sure what country you’re talking about, but I assume the U.S. We do have taxes deducted from payroll, and you fill out a form telling the employer (and the IRS) what amount to deduct based on estimated income, family size, and a couple of other factors. Then in April we have to file our official tax form declaring actual income, and if we owe less than what was deducted from our paychecks we receive that back as a refund, but if we underestimated we have to pay whatever taxes are remaining. The reason that filing taxes is so complicated is the sheer volume of deductions, exemptions, credits, etc that have been piled on top of the tax code over the years (plus lobbying by the tax prep industry). It’s a stupid system, but it’s not as stupid as some people seem to be assuming in this thread. If you set up your withholding right, you shouldn’t ever owe taxes when it’s time to file.

      Now, if you’re self-employed or a contractor (and considered self-employed) the whole thing kind of falls apart and it’s a lot easier to wind up owning a bunch of money. Like I said, it is a stupid system, just not quite as crazy as some people seem to be assuming.

      • WxFisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        I can’t agree with this enough, though I think part of the problem is that it isn’t what’s easy to complete your W-4 accurately, there is an entire worksheet to use if you file jointly that is sorta difficult to do well, especially if both people make fairly different amounts. If you just choose the basic withholding it’s very likely the bigger breadwinner isn’t withholding enough and you’ll end up owing about what the comic shows (at least that is my experience, as well as some friends).

        I think the real problem in the US is that everyone is left to do their tax paperwork from scratch every year when the IRS could send you a personalized return prefilled that you then claim the deductions and credits you’re due and account for any descrpenices (which sure, is what your W-2 is supposed to be, but it isn’t really that, you still need to use the worksheets on the 1040 or pay someone/some software to do it for you; a prefilled 1040 would be a way better system).

        It also doesn’t account for the huge variations in state taxes. Many states have income taxes, some are reciprocal with nearby states and others aren’t, the deductions and credits and even what is taxable is all different. The whole thing is a mess. Then lord help you if you live in a state with local income taxes or one where your local taxes are different than school taxes(like PA) and the whole thing is a half day exercise in frustration to complete and you’re still left wondering if you did it right.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        38 minutes ago

        If you set up your withholding right, you shouldn’t ever owe taxes when it’s time to file.

        Thing is, here in Germany you don’t even get to make the mistake of setting up your withholdings wrong if you’re a regular employee. I don’t think it’s even possible to end up owing the state money if you’re not self-employed or have considerable capital investments (which is rare for regular employees, which is probably its own issue …).

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep, and this cartoon feels like America would keep voting for this stupid fascist stuff as long as they keep promising the Libertarian ideal of lower and lower taxes.

      Americans trained to defund America, the enemy was inside all along.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Have you read A Libertarian Walks Into a Bear?

        At the end of the libertarian experiment (which surprisingly ended in failure) they had almost no services in the town yet still paid as much taxes as the neighboring towns which had tons of fully funded services.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you live in the USA then the government didnt decide to keep making it worse, the people did.

    GOP wrote the last tax plan and they’re about to write the new one.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        Blame the people who pay off the politicias and put rightwing propaganda on almost all mainstream media. Common people have to spend a LOT of effort to get even a resemblance of agency.

  • tensor_nightly69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This government doesn’t deserve our tax dollars. Theyve made it clear they’re funneling as much as possible straight to the billionaires.

    Just don’t pay.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And what would that do?

      They already run a deficit, so they’ll run a bigger deficit. Printing money is a flat tax on everyone. So not paying taxes is just applying a flat tax on others.

      Plus you get to go to jail and cost me money to support you there.

      I’m all for effective protest, but this doesn’t seem to be it.