"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 29 days agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11.7Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.68Karrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 29 days agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·29 days agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·29 days agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.