• doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    California’s food industry relies heavily on water from out of state, if those rivers dried up because flow got restricted to a trickle, it would be bad for their industry. None of this would happen without violent conflict though. Remember when the north burned the south to the ground? That is our historical precedent for how to respond to secession.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I could see Oregon and Washington State throwing in with Cali, giving all of them a direct line to nice fresh Canadian Rocky BC Springs because we up here in Canada would be an instant ally of any states that broke off.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You cannot get water from southern Oregon into California by any practical manner. Same as the person you replied to, the Central Valley and coastal regions are inaccessible except from the Sierra Nevada or Colorado River.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Most of Oregon hates Portland these days, and I grew up in Portland. But I don’t think secession would be up to a vote, it would be decided by violence like it always has been. That doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be successful, but I think Portland would still be burned to the ground.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          That’s always been the case that the rural backwater hillbilly sister-fucking areas hate the cities. The same is true in California. But it doesn’t matter because there are more people in the cities so they have more power so the yokels can’t do shit.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Much of the agricultural land would be fine. However the population centers in SoCal would have to make drastic cuts without the Colorado River.

    • duckworthy36@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      California is at the forefront of water conservation recycling in the US, and supports energy self sufficiency. The water issue is a problem, but not nearly as big as you might think. The state and water districts regularly fund new technologies and invest in storage. It would suck for a while, but in the long run, freedom from federal system might actually speed up changes that need to be made anyway.