• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The only one I know of shut down and the admin posted this message:

    I knew Lemmy had its challenges, but I hoped it would evolve for the better. Sadly after 2 years, the culture of censorship through defederation has only grown stronger.

    So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship. A few people in that thread linked to another instance I’ve never heard of as an alternative and that one 404s if you type in the address so I guess they’re all still on reddit and twitter.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship

      Damn, I actually didn’t see that coming, I guess they will move the goal post from any starting point.

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’m going to play devil’s advocate and ask: How is it not censorship?

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

          If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

          Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.

          • Gloomy@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I would argue that censorship includes the suppression of information in its definition, not only it’s removal.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              The information isn’t being suppressed, just not allowed to seep our of the trash bin it’s currently in

              If you want the garbage it’s easy to find. Most normal people don’t, so it gets kept where it won’t taint everything

              • Gloomy@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Same logic applied to something the right does:

                “We are not banning books, we are just not allowing them in libraries and schools. You can always buy them if you feel the need to expose your child to them.”

                So, following your logic, the right isn’t suppressing information about LGBtQI+ people.

                Dont get me wrong please, I don’t think right wing content should stand unchallenged. I am just not a big fan of only allowing the “correct” information. Because, that is what the right is doing already (while screaming about free speach, mind you). I think it’s better to engage with right content and destroy it with arguments, rather then just banning it. I know I’m a minority with that opinion on Lemmy. I’m fine with that.