• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And of course, this is all about people pushing zionist land theft. If they arent busy beating students, buying politicians, and threatening universities, they are trying to literally rewrite history and limit everyones access to information they dont agree with. And they somehow think there will never be any blowback for any of this behavior. They really do literally think we are all sheep.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Alright

    Show me the exact article that is propaganda, and why

    Obviously you’ll have to add citations on your end to show why exactly it would be propaganda and oh yeah,there is the issue

    Wikipedia isn’t bad because it’s propaganda, Wikipedia is bad because it’s not propaganda

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Why do that when they can lie through their teeth to just get it shut down altogether?

      Remember: “‘Meet me in the middle,’ says the unjust man. You take a step forward, he takes a step back. ‘Meet me in the middle,’ says the unjust man.”

      There is no arguing sense and logic with these people. Their goal is to make you suffer. Nothing else.

    • tissn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Show me the exact article that is propaganda, and why

      Here’s Pulitzer prize winning journalist Glenn Greenwald giving you a few examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKwAJG1O8fE

      Here’s Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger arguing why Wikipedia is the “Most Biased Encyclopedia in History": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR6dO8U8okk

      However, there is no reason to trust that the Trump administration has any good intentions behind their current attack on Wikipedia. My suspicion is that they want even more control and propaganda - just in their favor.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I found a thread with 10 reasons not to trust Wikipedia. One of the reasons listed is citogenesis. Under that they write 3 paragraphs in which they first say most people don’t know what citogensis is. In the remainder of the 3 paragraphs they never explain what it is. I cant tell if that is a parody site or not.

        • nullroot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I spent 10 minutes perusing that site too and came to a similar conclusion. It’s gotta either be parody or hate mongering. It kinda reads like a teenager who made bad edits to Wikipedia, got banned from editing and then made it their life’s work to hate Wikipedia.

          That 10 reasons post was so silly, complaining about the need to check sources and verify data while providing no sources and spouting clearly skewed beliefs.

        • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You can cherrypick all you want and ignore the massive amount of facts and incidents that prove Wikipedia is controled garbage.
          Keep your head in the sand and don’t be sceptical then.
          Enjoy being misinformed and manipulated if that’s what you want.

          • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Can you link to these facts? I admit I have no doubt in my mind the website is at best a parody and at worst bullshit. But I feel I’m open minded enough that I’ll take a look at any facts you have to present. I tried to take a look for myself but everything I found on that sight seems like old man yelling at clouds.

            Also I’m curious as to what you mean when you say I can cherrypick all I want? What is that in reference to?

      • rylock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s funny you think these are credible sources. Says more about you than it does Wikipedia, speaking of not having a clue.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No surprise there - Republicans have hated Wikipedia pretty much from the start, since they require valid attribution and constantly fact check, which means the Republicans can’t spin their lies.

    • EstonianGuy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fortunately whatever happens, wiki is downloaded all over the world. If they try to “regulate” or shut it down, it will just pop up abroad.

      You cannot suppress open source info.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The tricky bit is that Wikipedia is a “living” document, constantly being updated and refined by a huge community of dedicated editors, and you can’t download the community and pop up a new one overnight. AI isn’t that good yet.

        • albert180@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 day ago

          Then you just move the domain to one of their many subsidiaries abroad. The Community will be smart enough to access another Wikipedia tld

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Assuming that there’s just one single new site that pops up that everyone agrees to go to en masse, and that it has enough resources to handle the load, and that its administration is aligned with the same goals as the original.

            It could happen, but it’s by no means as simple and easy as cloning a repository.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 day ago

              They’d still use the top level domain, just change the physical server location and point there. Canada, maybe.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                You’re still making the assumption that “they” are the same people. That’s the point here, Wikipedia-the-organization is being threatened.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And you’re missing the larger point:

                  Paranoia is bad. If you jump at every “they could do…” you’re going to be unable to jump at the “they fucking are doing”.

                  You want something to freak out about? They’re arresting judges for managing their courtroom.

                  Yeah, threatening to yeet wiki’s nonprofit status is bad. But its a very far cry from offing the board or whoever is leading Wikipedia and installing their own.

                  This rampant paranoia is not helping the 2yo that got deported.

                  They can move the website out of the government’s reach, in response to any action they might take. Worrying about any other possibility is just jumping at shadows.

              • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Problem with that is the domain is registered in the US. And the FBI has a history of claiming domains whose content the US government wants offline.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What are you talking about?

                  You can just change to a registrar that is out of the country. Like. Really. Not that hard. This is a normal thing people do.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Some of the contentions in Martin’s letter echoed a report published in March by the Anti-Defamation League, a leading Jewish civil rights organisation, alleging “widespread anti-semitic and anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia”.

    What a fucking surprise 🙄 Facts are antisemitic now.

    • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Anti-Israel, anti-fascist, anti-apartheid, pro-Palestine != anti-semitic.

      The ADL can go fuck themselves for propagating otherwise.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hopefully sites like Wikipedia and Internet Archive already have backup sites not located in the US.

  • ncrav@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Go ahead, may they move somewhere else as fast as possible. As soon as we remove useful services from their grasp the better.

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      AFAIK other language Wikipedias already are incorporated “elsewhere” (the world¹).

      ¹ there actually is one outside the US