Using “John Doe” pseudonyms, they sued over whether the investigation into their activities should be made public. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in February that they can be identified and that they haven’t shown that public release of their names violates their right to privacy. The state supreme court denied reconsideration earlier this month and lawyers for the four officers submitted a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking that the names remain protected during their legal challenge.
Four officers who attended events in the nation’s capital on the day of an insurrection claimed they are protected under the state’s public records law. They say they did nothing wrong and that revealing their names would violate their privacy.
Yes, because innocent people always love to hide their innocence. Right.
I mean, there’s nothing inherently bad about wanting to keep your identity private. That should be a human right, if anything.
That said, J6ers need to be named and shamed, especially those in positions of power and authority. The latter part should be the single exception for the “privacy is a right” idea.
It’s not just that, cops use the bullshit “if you have nothing to hide…” line all the time
Yep. I fell for that exactly once, and looking back on it I was incredibly lucky it worked in my favor (I’m also white, which absolutely helped).
Well the question is did they merely “attend the rally”, or did they “participate in the violent storming of the Capitol building”?
Because honestly, there’s a big difference. Not everyone that attended the rally stormed the capitol. So it could be reasonable to not want your name made public just for being there.
Then again they are cops so they probably did storm the Capitol.
Then again, again, the mere fact that I assume that is probably why they don’t want their identities made public - especially if they were never charged for a crime.