• stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Google is not a human so why would you communicate with it as if it were a human? unlike chatgpt it’s not designed to answer questions, it’s designed to search for words on webpages

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Except Google has been optimizing for natural language questions for the last decade or so. Try it sometime, it’s really wild

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Because we’re human, and that’s a human-made tool. It’s made to fit us and our needs, not the other way around. And in case you’ve missed the last decade, it actually does it rather well.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We spend most of our time communicating with humans so we’re generally better at that than communicating with algorithms and so it feels more comfortable.

      Most people don’t want to learn to communicate with a search engine in its own language. Learning is hard.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Surely you see how using a search engine is a separate skill from just writing words?

              Point is, people don’t want to learn. Natural language searches in the form of questions are just easier for people, because they already know how to ask questions.

              • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                Do you really need to learn to realise the words “is” and “in” aren’t that important and that “Angelina Jolie heat” is good enough for a search query?

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Any time we use words in a way that’s different from a conversation it requires learning. That ranges from argumentation to story telling to, in this case, search queries. If it’s different from talking to another human, it’s a different skill.

                • howrar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I don’t think we would’ve had so many lessons on this in school if it didn’t need to be taught.