Summary

The FCC has demanded CBS provide the full, unedited transcript of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, following a complaint and a lawsuit by Donald Trump.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, appointed by Trump, has reversed past media-related dismissals and launched new investigations into broadcasters.

CBS is also in settlement talks with Trump amid concerns over a pending Paramount-Skydance merger.

Critics argue the FCC’s actions constitute government retaliation against the press, raising concerns over First Amendment protections and media independence.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I would love to live in a world where CBS tells them to go fuck themselves, and airs an hourlong special on the history of free speech protections in the United States and the meaning of the term “chilling effect.”

    It seems like kind of the bare minimum. If they as an American news organization are not at least willing to do that, they should replace that proud-of-itself ticking clock intro with a little clip of some of the news reports from Starship Troopers.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      CBS is also in settlement talks with Trump amid concerns over a pending Paramount-Skydance merger.

      that is all you need to know about this situation to conclude what will happen.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    The government can demand unpublished journalism materials, and CBS has the right to tell them to fuck off, which they would if they have any integrity left.

    • arglebargle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Sure. And then the government revokes your broadcast license.

      And then fines you.

      And then breaks your assets up.

      Fun times.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    If the interview was broadcast, there must be video recordings, so what is the big deal about unedited transcripts? They can watch the video and see what she said.

    Do they mean they want stuff she said that didn’t go on the air? That would be invasive.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Hmm. Does the FCC actually have the authority to do that?

    I mean, I don’t know the details of the thing here, but their authority really extends just over what goes out over the air. I don’t think that they have any special authority over the inner workings of companies, just because they happen to be in the news business.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        They can ask for it, but that doesn’t mean that CBS has to do it, and if they want to take it to the courts, then they’re going to need to have a legal argument.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          It doesn’t matter if they have a legal argument. They want to scare the execs at CBS Paramount so that CBS Paramount capitulates and gives in, just like ABC did.

          And guess what?

          It’s working.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            Some people really need to go study the rise of the Third Reich. They will be feeling like they have deja vu.

            • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              You best start believing in thick chapters in the history book. You’re in one.

              Good reading: “Maus” by Art Spiegelman, “Night” by Elie Wiesel.