• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I once met a guy who was in sales for a shipping container company. He said it was the easiest, most lucrative sales job in the world. There really wasn’t any sales at all, he just processed the orders that flowed in all day long. He got a fat commission on each one, and earned several commissions every single day. He was making BANK. He said it was nearly impossible to get a job doing that, it would require somebody to die to get their position.

    I guess he’s going to have a bad year, for a change.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oh look, trump did something good! accidentally good, I’m sure he didn’t intended that, but still

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This could be the best thing the current administration did for the planet. No more shipping boats. It’s going to be really interesting in the next two months.

  • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    1 day ago

    I read something that some people experienced the collapse of the Roman Empire as their local bridge going out and no one ever coming to fix it.

    I think a lot of Americans are going to experience the collapse of the American empire as their favorite treats never getting to the store shelves.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My town’s bridge is in need of repair, which was to start this year but is now delayed because federal funding for it was cut. We’ll see…

      • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Thankfully infrastructure week is just around the corner!..

        Or they’ll just argue those failing bridges are okay because aren’t used that much

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s highly optimistic to expect that, if anything it’s going to be more like the collapse of the Soviet empire, with weird successor state nonsense, some civil war, guns and violent crime everywhere, and those already in power going on a free for all kill each other and loot everything spree.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s going to be a Rwandan style civil war. Your MAGA neighbor will kick in your door and shoot you and your wife in the face when told to do so by Fox.

      • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean to say, for most Americans who are not news aware, the first signs will be that they simply can’t get their treats anymore.

        Even then, many of the more rural Americans will only ever have that experience. There’s not going to be guns and tanks rolling through Westboro, Wisconsin.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t think that at all. Living in the 4th or 5th century is not at all apologies to the 21st.

          People will notice everything being more expensive. Facebook memes will tell them why that is so.

        • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I think you are underestimating the level of chaos and violence we are headed for. This is going to be much worse than Rome. We will be the barbarians at our own gates.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          As one of those more rural Americans-- we’ve always lived that life of not being able to get those things the rest of you take for granted. Whether it’s tofu, cell phone service, or healthcare. So my life will continue with little disruption.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem is that existing power structures will try to transfer their power to the new system, and it isn’t that hard for them to do that. A new anarchist communistic structure will have to fight the CIA and the US military’s various fragments, if it goes as it did in the Warsaw Pact.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Those holding the Power Of Money will keep on using it as long as it has value to make sure they are alright (and screw the rest) hence they’ll keep on propping-up and buying out whomever controls Force and when those lose that control they’ll directly prop-up and buy out the yielders of Force.

            Sure, they would’ve preferred it for the many to pay the full costs of formal yielders of Force whose main jobs is protect the holders of the Power Of Money and their assets from the rest - the way the system still works right now - but they can easilly afford to pay the yielders of Force directly if they have to.

            Further, even if Money loses its value and hence its power, they’ll fall back to using what’s produced by the Assets they own (for example, food produced in fertile land) to pay the yielders of Force: in a total societal collapse (which, frankly, is unlikely) you can bet that the moneyed classes will use whatever power their money has left to either flee to places were society is not collapsing or setting themselves up as the Warlords of the subsequent age.

            Anyways, the point anchoring my free thinking about this is that they’ll try to keep the very same ownership, dependency and control loops going, just at smaller and smaller sizes (i.e. instead of the society-wide “people have no option that directly or indirectly work for the owners of everything to pay for the place they live in and the food they eat who cost what they cost because just a few own everything” you’ll have a smaller sized version of it with a landowner whose land produces food and who uses that food and living areas in that land to pay a couple of armed people to stop the rest from taking the land and the food, so a smaller version of the societal loop we have now were the very people being exploited by money are the ones indirectly giving money the power to exploit them).

          • rayyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Perhaps we will see a more localized anarchist sub-system purely out of necessity.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          White power movments are literally waiting for this moment. The outliers are the accelerationists but there far far more that have been preparing for generations to exploit the power vacuum.

          A local anarchist group is no match for an well armed generation based organization.

          • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Why wouldn’t the anarchists be well armed too, especially if that’s an obvious necessity for your commune to survive? The only people in the US who refuse to touch a gun, even if their lives depend on it, are the centrist liberals.

            • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Lol no they’re not. Trump seized power in a legal coup. They support the constitution and the constitution says Trump is POTUS. Short of a military coup, they will continue to do his bidding and be formed by Goebbels’s propaganda.

          • blakenong@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, anyone trying to create an anarchist/communist utopian community will be quickly swallowed up be the Proud Boys who raid them for their food and guzzoline.

  • Thoralf Will@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump definitely did not intent to do that - but this is a good thing for the environment. If we end up in a global shrinkflation, this might berge worst way to reduce our carbon footprint, but it will probably be the long term consequence.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Note, that data is from April 8th, which is before the 90 day tariff pause was announced.

    From what my friends working in retail have told me, the trend is (temporarily) reversed. Every freight container going to the US is getting booked solid at inflated rates as brands try to bring in merchandise from non-Chinese factories into the US in case the tariffs resume.

  • Sonor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is it me, or does this look absolutely scary for world trade as a whole?

    • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There’s still a lot going on globally:

      https://www.marinetraffic.com/

      But I don’t expect the US to have a fun ride

      This economist says there’s a 90% chance of a recession. Here’s the math.

      During the 2018 trade war with China, the U.S. average tariff rate increased from 2% to 3%. Studies show that the impact on gross domestic product was between 0.25% and 0.7%.

      Using the low end of the estimated impact, and Trump’s plan that at the moment calls for double-digit tariff rates, Slok says the negative impact on GDP in 2025 could be almost 4 percentage points — and that doesn’t even include the negative impact from uncertainty for consumer spending decisions and business planning.

      https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-economist-says-theres-a-90-chance-of-a-recession-unless-tariff-policies-are-changed-e43c40d1?mod=home_lead

      So a 4% hit to GDP when GDP last year in the US increase by 2.8% does not sound good

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I told friends and relatives in February that we’d be in a recession by the end of the year. I expected 3 quarters for it, not his first 2. 2 consecutive quarters of economic contraction are needed by the modern definition of a recession.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A nearly 50% drop in booked global TEUs?

      TEU means Twenty Foot Equivalent Units, your basic standard shipping container.

      Yes, yes, this is astoundingly, apocalyptically bad.

      America will be more fucked than others, but this is Great Depression 2.0.

      If this persists, and you end up with a the rest of the year of roughly half the TEU… well you’d go from about 900m TEU to about 550m TEU.

      The last time global sea trade clocked in at about 550m TEU was 2010.

      https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter5/intermodal-transportation-containerization/world-container-throughput/

      So… yeah, just wipe out the last 15 years worth of volume of world trade, and economic activity/growth enabled by that, and oh also you have about 1 billion more mouths to feed than in 2010.

      Or… if you look at it in terms of % change… its hard to find detailed, historical, week by week figures without paying for the data, but the entirety of the GFC hitting the global economy in 2009 resulted in an 8.5% decrease in global TEU from 2008.

      So… it remains to be seen how long and strong the current downturn in TEU will persist…

      But, if you say 2025 TEU drops by 30% in aggregate for the rest of this year… that is a 2025 that has a -22.5% ‘growth’ in total world trade volume, almost 3x as bad as the 07 08 09 GFC, the impact of which was seen in the -8.5% of 2009.

      These are spitball guess numbers, I can’t predict the future… but I do have a degree in Econ and I used to work as an executive level data analyst for a large mulinational, US based import export firm… so its moderately informed spitball guess.

      This is Great Depression 2.0, this will make the GFC look like childs play. This is tens or hundreds of millions of people (globally) going broke, becoming homeless, starving to death levels of bad.

      The only way to prevent that at this point is … well basically step one is America needs to impeach and imprison every Trump administration member… but that is uh… not guaranteed, to say the least.

    • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, one problem here is that global container circulation needs to, well, circulate. People don’t ship empty containers, that’s stupid expensive. So container hire is going to get way more expensive as global shipping needs to rebalance. Happened under covid, too.

    • oppy1984@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I work in international freight and my department focuses on the U.S. - Canadian border. We’ve been bracing for a decline but so far our volume has been steadily increasing.

      I see the documents for every shipment crossing my assigned gateway and it looks like consumer goods are staying at the same volume, but B2B is increasing. So while Canadian consumers are boycotting American goods, industry is reliant on American parts to continue functioning.

      I’m assuming the increased volume is a result of companies buying things that they know they will need in the future before the trade war intensifies and those same parts cost them even more.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Link to the image is still up, so we have to remove this as an image post.

    If you replace the image with the link to the article, we can restore it.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is Trump working on Making America Great Again, by turning it into a European colony again? A massive trade war with China, is obviously going to hurt both countries and Europe is the largest economy left.

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly he idolizes Russia, so … Their economy is barely an international one right now. Also one of the worst internationally for a “major” country.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The main reason he is doing this is only because his Hero did it.

    And trump really likes doing ANYTHING Hitler did.

  • aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess MAGA people will see this as a win? Since imports are down 2x much as imports. If the value of the goods in these containers are roughly equal, that should mean smaller trade deficits?